诺里斯为何说“我没有一辆能争冠的车”？
尽管连续赢下两场大奖赛，诺里斯仍表示自己缺乏争冠所需的赛车，认为迈凯伦MCL40只在高速弯强势，低速弯劣势明显，赛季剩余比赛会很艰难。
是什么让诺里斯说“我没有一辆能争冠的车”？
尽管连续赢下两场大奖赛，兰多·诺里斯仍坚称，他对在剩余比赛中争夺F1世界冠军没有信心。
我们的专家解读赛车运动中最重要的故事。
2026赛季F1锦标赛正处于一个奇特的交汇点：没有人愿意承认自己拥有最好的赛车。
积分领跑者基米·安东内利在荷兰大奖赛输给兰多·诺里斯获得亚军后表示，梅赛德斯已不再拥有最好的赛车——事实上，它可能只是第三好的。
但诺里斯目前以159分位居第四，安东内利为242分。尽管连续赢下两场大奖赛，他仍决心淡化关于他将在赛季后半段发起反击的说法。“我没有一辆我需要的能争冠的车，”他在荷兰大奖赛获胜后说。
许多读者会忍不住引用所谓的“曼迪·赖斯-戴维斯原则”——“嗯，他们当然会那么说，不是吗？”
不过，明确的是，在最新技术规则下，赛车之间的相对优势仍存在差异，这让竞争格局变得复杂。粗略来说，迈凯伦MCL40在高速弯中如鱼得水，法拉利SF-26在带着良好速度进入低速弯方面很强，而梅赛德斯W17则介于两者之间。这使得竞争平衡在很大程度上取决于赛道布局。
诺里斯的观点是，他的赛车不够全面，无法像去年迈凯伦在大多数赛道上都是标杆那样，在剩余各站中占据统治地位。
诺里斯淡化了荷兰大奖赛胜利的意义。
“我们在某些领域有一辆很强的车，”他说。“不像去年那样我们在所有地方都很好。我们在高速方面非常非常强。我们把车提升最多的地方就是高速性能。”
“在高速方面没人能与我们匹敌。这是好事。我在7号弯、8号弯对梅赛德斯的圈速优势大得离谱。”
“但他们在低速方面对我们的优势也大得离谱。因此我没有信心说，是的，我可以在赛季剩余时间里轻松争冠。我知道我刚连续赢了两场比赛、连续拿了两 个杆位，但目前我没有一辆我需要的能争冠的车。”
“我知道这话分量很重，但我认为去年我明白了赛车需要什么、我需要做什么。我知道自己现在的水平以及我能发挥到什么程度。我也清楚我需要赛车给我什么——以及接下来哪些赛道我们肯定会更挣扎。”
问题比简单地说某辆赛车在某种弯角快更复杂。今年的赛车更短、更窄、也略轻——而且底盘特性与动力单元性能的关联比以往任何时候都更紧密，因为入弯速度会影响能量回收。
迈凯伦选择短轴距，这帮助其在赛季初节省重量，但也固化了某些短板，即车队能从底板榨取多少空气动力学载荷。
不同轮胎配方之间的表现往往差异巨大。在周六的冲刺赛中，使用中性胎的诺里斯在后轮退化方面很挣扎，并在最后阶段被法拉利的夏尔·勒克莱尔超越。在大奖赛中，他用旧软胎重新起步，起步时被安东内利超越，直到换上硬胎才真正进入比赛。
诺里斯在赞德沃特比赛后段能够向积分领跑者安东内利施压。
“我们换上了硬胎，”他说。“我们在如何应对这个阶段上更激进了一些。我们扭转了局面。我在车里有了我想要的那种感觉。我从觉得自己赢不了比赛，变成了至少我们可以逼他（安东内利）犯错。”
“当我从赛车中得到我需要的东西，当我有了我想要的前端，当我在入弯时对后部有了信心——当我能知道并预测每一个弯角时，我就会赢下比赛。”
诺里斯的驾驶风格与马克斯·维斯塔潘更接近，而不是乔治·拉塞尔，甚至也不是他自己的队友奥斯卡·皮亚斯特里。他不是把收油/刹车和转向阶段分开，而是喜欢把油门和刹车重叠起来，并采用更浅的入弯角度。本质上，他是在感受前轮开始产生更多横向抓地力的重叠点，这有助于旋转赛车并把更多速度带入弯中、指向弯心。
这不仅要求赛车有“强”的前端，还要求它能传达前轮正在做什么，这是一项艰难的工程挑战。现代F1赛车需要一致的离地间隙才能让空气动力学最佳运作，因此悬挂几何被设计成尽量减少俯冲和下沉。这其中的一个副作用是削弱了车手的“感觉”。
有些人能忍受，有些人不能，这就是为什么当诺里斯在上赛季初陷入困境时，迈凯伦为他设计了另一种前悬挂几何，并修改了主销角度。一旦他有了那种感觉，他就能在走线和油门刹车重叠程度上非常适应，这也是他在低抓地力条件下如鱼得水的原因。
但尽管他在这个范围内有很强的适应能力，他仍然需要强大的前端、良好的感觉传递，以及后轴能按预期可预测地旋转的信心。
“我们的弱点很清楚，”诺里斯总结道。“因此我们需要攻克这些问题。在我们做到之前，赛季末仍会非常艰难。”
英文原文
What makes Norris say “I don't have a car to fight for the championship”?
Despite two consecutive grand prix wins, Lando Norris insists he isn’t confident about fighting for the F1 world championship in the remaining races
Our experts decode the most important stories in motorsport.
The 2026 Formula 1 championship finds itself at a curious intersection where nobody is willing to entertain the idea that they have the best car.
Championship leader Kimi Antonelli said after finishing second to Lando Norris in the Dutch Grand Prix that Mercedes no longer has the best car – indeed, that it may only be the third best.
But Norris, now fourth in the standings with 159 points to Antonelli’s 242, was determined to play down talk of him staging a comeback in the final half of the season, despite winning two consecutive grands prix. "I don't have the car I need to fight for a championship," he said after his Dutch GP victory.
Many readers would be tempted to cite the so-called Mandy Rice-Davies principle – "Well they would say that, wouldn’t they?"
What’s clear, though, is that under the latest technical regulations there is still a difference in relative strengths between cars which complicates the competitive picture. In broad-brush terms the McLaren MCL40 thrives in fast corners, Ferrari’s SF-26 is strong in terms of carrying good speed into slow corners, while the Mercedes W17 is somewhere between the two. That makes the competitive balance heavily dependent on circuit layout.
Norris’s contention is that his car is insufficiently rounded to be dominant across the remaining rounds in the way last year’s McLaren was the car to beat at most tracks.
Norris played down the significance of his Dutch GP victory
"We have a strong car in certain areas," he said. "It's not like last year where we were pretty good everywhere. We're very, very strong in high speed. The place we've improved the car the most is high-speed performance.
"No one matches us in high speed. And that's a good thing. My pace advantage to Mercedes in Turn 7, Turn 8 was crazy.
"But their advantage that they have to us in slow speed is also crazy. And therefore I don't have the confidence to say, yeah, I can easily fight for a championship for the rest of the season. I know I've just won two races in a row and two poles in a row, but at the minute I don't have the car I need to fight for a championship.
"And I know that's quite a big comment, but I think last year I understood what is needed from a car and what was needed from me. And I know the level that I am now and what I can perform at. And I know just what I need from the car – and what tracks we have coming up where we're going to certainly struggle more."
The issue is more complex than simply saying a particular car is fast around a certain type of corner. This year’s cars are shorter, narrower and slightly lighter – and the chassis characteristics are more interconnected with power unit performance than ever before, given the influence of corner-entry speeds on energy harvesting.
McLaren's decision to run a short wheelbase, helping it save weight at the start of the season, has baked in certain shortcomings in terms of how much aerodynamic load the team can squeeze from the floor.
Performance is often hugely variable between tyre compounds. In Saturday’s sprint race, running mediums, Norris struggled with rear degradation and was overtaken by Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc in the closing stages. In the grand prix he took the restart on used softs, was passed by Antonelli at the start, and didn’t really get into the race until the hard-compound tyres went on.
Norris was able to pressure championship leader Antonelli later in the Zandvoort race
"We put on the hard tyres," he said. "We were a bit more aggressive with how we wanted to approach the stint. And we turned things around. I had that feeling in the car that I wanted. I went from just not feeling like I was going to win a race to at least we can force him [Antonelli] to make mistakes.
"When I get what I need from a car, when I have the front I want, when I get the confidence with the rear on entries – just when I get what I need to be able to know and predict every single corner, I'm going to win a race."
Norris has a driving style slightly more aligned to Max Verstappen than the likes of George Russell or even his own team-mate, Oscar Piastri. Rather than separating the throttle off/brake on and turning phases, he likes to blend the throttle and brakes and take a shallower approach angle. Essentially he is feeling for the point in the overlap where the front tyres begin to exert more lateral grip, which helps rotate the car and carry more speed into the corner, towards the apex.
This requires the car not only to have a 'strong' front end, but also to communicate what the front tyres are doing, which represents a tough engineering challenge. Modern F1 cars require a consistent ride height for the aerodynamics to function optimally, so the suspension geometry is designed to minimise dive and squat. A side of this is that it saps driver 'feel'.
Some can live with that, some can’t, which is why McLaren designed an alternate front suspension geometry with a revised kingpin angle for Norris when he was floundering at the beginning of last season. Once he has that feel he can be very adaptable in terms of his lines and the degree of overlap between throttle and brake, which is why he thrives in low-grip conditions.
But although he has a huge amount of adaptability within this range, he still needs that strong front end, good transmission of feel, and confidence that the rear axle will rotate predictably on cue.
"It's clear where our weaknesses are," Norris concluded. "Therefore we need to attack those things. And until we do that, it's still going to be a very tough end of the season."
Autosport ·
内容来自公开信源，聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。