奥迪就角田裕毅起步事件中干事裁决提出上诉
奥迪已提交上诉意向通知，针对意大利大奖赛干事未就角田裕毅涉嫌违反起步程序一事适用F1运动规则的决定提出上诉。
奥迪已提交通知，表示打算对意大利大奖赛干事的决定提出上诉，该决定未就角田裕毅在首次计划重启时涉嫌违反发车程序一事，执行一级方程式的体育规则。
角田本应在重启时于发车区排在第14位，但他最初驶向了第15位的发车格，随后才转向右侧。
他得以停在第14位的发车格内，且并未越过最前方的标线而处于越位状态，不过他的小红牛赛车以一个略微倾斜的角度指向维修区护墙。
因此，比赛总监鲁伊·马奎斯组织了又一次编队圈，用干事的话说，“他表示赛车处于那个位置让他无法放心地发车起步”。
此事被提交给了赛事干事，但在赛后针对涉嫌违反体育规则B5.9.4条款——即由车手导致额外暖胎圈（formation lap）——的调查中，他们认为角田并不是造成此事的责任人。
任何导致额外暖胎圈但能够开始该圈的车手，都必须“在该圈结束时进入维修通道，并且必须从维修通道末尾开始[该节比赛]”。
但小红牛成功地论证了：角田的赛车并不处于“抢跑”位置——即前轮胎接地面超出发车位格子之外；没有任何其他车手受到角田位置的影响；而且角田并不是额外暖胎圈的“起因”，小红牛也没有被告知他是起因。
因此，主要的区别在于，赛事干事认为“额外暖胎圈是由赛事总监对当时情况的判断所导致的”，并据此决定不适用相关条款，还补充说，小红牛“在我们看来，没有理由指示其车手进入维修通道并从那里发车”。
他们因此判定无法对角田执行一次通过维修区（停走）处罚。
国际汽联在一份简短声明中表示，赛后它就“B5.9.4 条款适用问题”提出了关注，而在干事作出“不予进一步处理”的决定后，它已通知有意提出上诉。它有 96 小时的时间来决定是否确定推进这一上诉。
如果角田受到处罚，奥迪将从中受益。
按照惯例，一级方程式的体育规则规定，任何未执行的停走处罚将被转换为赛后加时 30 秒的处罚。
这将使角田裕毅——他在小红牛替补参赛期间于第十名拿到了自己的第一个积分——在最终排名中跌至第15位，同时让奥迪的博托莱托升入最后一个获得积分的位置。
英文原文
Audi has lodged notice of its intention to appeal against the Italian Grand Prix stewards's decision not to apply Formula 1's sporting regulations in relation to Yuki Tsunoda's alleged infringement of the start procedure at the first planned restart.
Tsunoda was due to line up 14th on the grid for the restart but initially headed towards the 15th-place grid slot, only to veer to the right-hand side.
He was able to park up in the 14th-place slot and was not out of position beyond the forwardmost line, although his Racing Bulls car was pointing at a slight angle towards the pitwall.
Race director Rui Marques initiated another formation lap as a result as, in the words of the stewards, "he stated he was not comfortable starting the race with the car in that position".
The matter was referred to the stewards but in a post-race investigation into alleged breach of article B5.9.4 of the sporting regulations, relating to a driver causing an extra formation lap, they deemed Tsunoda had not been responsible for that.
Any driver who does cause an additional formation lap but is able to start that lap is required to "enter the pitlane at the end of the lap and must start the [session] from the end of the pitlane".
But Racing Bulls successfully argued that Tsunoda's car had not been in a "false start" position with the contact patch of the front tyres outside of the grid box, that no other driver had been impacted by Tsunoda's position, and that Tsunoda had not been the "cause" of the extra formation lap nor had Racing Bulls been advised that he was the cause.
The main distinction therefore is that the stewards considered the "extra formation lap resulted from the race director's assessment of the situation" in deciding against applying the relevant article and said additionally that Racing Bulls had "in our determination, no reason to instruct its driver to enter and start from the pitlane".
They determined they were unable to give Tsunoda a stop-and-go penalty as a result.
It said in a short statement that it had "raised a concern regarding the application of Article B5.9.4" after the race and that following the stewards' "no further action" decision it had notified its intention to appeal. It has a 96-hour window in which to decide if it will definitely go ahead with that appeal.
Audi would stand to benefit were Tsunoda to be penalised.
As standard, F1's sporting regulations state that any unserved stop-and-go penalty is converted to a 30-second post-race time penalty.
That would drop Tsunoda - who scored the first point of his stand-in spell at Racing Bulls in 10th - to 15th in the classification, promoting Audi's Gabriel Bortoleto to the final points-paying position.
The Race ·
内容来自公开信源，聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。