奥迪就角田裕毅意大利大奖赛裁决提出上诉意向
奥迪F1车队已通知国际汽联，就意大利大奖赛中角田裕毅未被处罚一事提出上诉意向。争议源于第6圈重新起步时角田的停车位置引发了额外的编队圈。
奥迪就角田裕毅在意大利大奖赛的判罚结果提交上诉意向
奥迪对国际汽联比赛干事不处罚角田裕毅的决定提出异议，后者被指在一级方程式意大利大奖赛中导致额外增加一圈编队圈
奥迪一级方程式车队已通知国际汽联，有意就角田裕毅在意大利大奖赛中未受处罚一事提起上诉
在第6圈重启比赛时，由于角田裕毅应该在哪里发车存在混乱，他把车停在了自己正确的第14位发车位上，但车头斜向内侧护墙。比赛总监鲁伊·马克斯对角田的位置感到"不放心"，因此决定额外增加一圈编队圈。
根据2026年一级方程式运动规则第B5.9.4条，"任何导致额外暖胎圈的车手，如果随后能够参加该暖胎圈或后续任何额外暖胎圈，必须在圈末驶入维修通道，并且必须……从维修通道末端发车。"
但根据国际汽联赛事干事的说法，角田在技术层面上并没有导致额外暖胎圈，因为赛事总监是出于高度谨慎才采取行动，角田并未离开自己的发车格，也没有影响其他参赛者。问题的核心在于，赛事控制中心也没有通知小红牛其车手导致了额外暖胎圈，因此车队没有理由要求角田从维修通道发车。
角田避过了通过维修区停站的处罚，并最终以第10名获得最后一个积分。不处罚这名日本车手的决定影响了奥迪的加布里埃尔·博托莱托（博托莱托），后者以第11名冲线。
因此，奥迪已将其就角田未受处罚一事提出上诉的意向通知了国际汽联。
奥迪在一份声明中表示：“意大利大奖赛之后，我们就B5.9.4条款的适用提出了一项关切，该条款要求导致额外编队圈的车手进入维修通道并从那里重新开始比赛。”“干事作出了不予进一步处理的裁定，我们已通知有意提出上诉。由于此事目前正处于国际汽联（FIA）的上诉程序中，我们在现阶段不会发表更多评论。”
如果角田裕毅被处以处罚，博托莱托本可以在蒙扎获得一个积分。
根据国际汽联国际运动规则第15.4条，参赛方须在干事作出裁定后一小时内通知其上诉意向。这并不意味着奥迪现在已经真正对这一裁决提起上诉。但这一小时内为车队提供了额外的96小时时间窗口，可以进一步研究此案，看看是否有值得上诉的内容，然后再正式提出上诉。
干事在裁定中写道：“额外的编队圈源于比赛总监对当时情况的判断，而不是由22号车的车手直接造成的。”
"此外，规则条款 B5.9.4 还进一步规定，如果一名导致多发一圈编队行驶的车手随后能够参加这一额外的编队行驶，那么他必须在该圈结束时进入维修通道，并从维修通道发车。只有当该车手未能这样做时，才会被处以强制性的停车再出发处罚。
"换句话说，处罚的原因是未能进入维修通道并从那里发车。处罚并不是因为导致了额外的编队行驶——即便他最初确实导致了额外的编队行驶。
"这里出现了一个关键问题：要遵守进入维修通道并从那里发车的要求，车手就必须知道自己是导致额外编队行驶的原因。"
干事们补充说："根据该车停在符合规则规定的发车格框线内这一事实，我们认定，车队没有任何理由指示其车手进入维修通道并从那里发车。
"因此，无论该车手是否直接导致了额外的编队圈，车队和车手并不知道自己被认为是造成这一情况的原因，所以我们认定在本案中无法施加停车通过（Stop and Go）处罚，并决定不再采取进一步行动。"
英文原文
Audi lodges intention to appeal against Yuki Tsunoda's Italian GP verdict
Audi takes issue with the FIA race stewards' decision not to penalise Yuki Tsunoda for allegedly causing an extra formation lap in the Formula 1 Italian Grand Prix
The Audi F1 team has notified the FIA of its intention to appeal against Yuki Tsunoda's non-penalty in the Italian GP.
Amid confusion over where he was supposed to line up on a lap 6 restart, Tsunoda parked in his correct 14th grid slot, but at an angle towards the inside wall. Race director Rui Marques was "not comfortable" with Tsunoda's position, so imposed an extra formation lap.
According to Article B5.9.4 of the F1 2026 sporting regulations, "any driver who caused an extra formation lap, and is then able to start the, or any subsequent, extra formation lap must enter the Pit Lane at the end of the lap and must start ... from the end of the Pit Lane."
But according to the FIA race stewards, Tsunoda didn't technically cause the extra formation lap because the race director acted out of an abundance of caution, Tsunoda wasn't out of his grid slot and didn't impact other competitors. The crux of the issue is that race control hadn't informed Racing Bulls that its driver had caused the extra formation lap either, so therefore the team had no reason to tell Tsunoda to start from the pitlane.
Tsunoda escaped a stop-and-go penalty and went on to score the final point in 10th. The decision not to punish the Japanese driver impacted Audi's Gabriel Bortoleto, who crossed the line in 11th.
As a result, Audi has notified the FIA of its intention to appeal against the non-penalty for Tsunoda.
"Following the Italian Grand Prix, we raised a concern regarding the application of Article B5.9.4, which requires a driver who causes an extra formation lap to enter the pit lane and resume the race from there," Audi said in a statement. "The Stewards issued a decision of No Further Action, and we have notified our intention to appeal. As the matter is now subject to the FIA appeal process, we will not comment further at this stage."
Gabriel Bortoleto would have gained a point in Monza if Yuki Tsunoda had been handed a penalty.
Per article 15.4 of the FIA's International Sporting Code, competitors have one hour after the stewards' decision to notify their intention to appeal. That does not mean Audi is actually appealing against the verdict just yet. But it gives the team an additional 96-hour time window to further study the case to see if there is an element to appeal against before following through on it.
In their verdict, the stewards wrote: "The extra formation lap resulted from the Race Director’s assessment of the situation, rather than being directly caused by the driver of Car 22.
"Further, Article B5.9.4 goes on to specify that if a driver who causes the extra formation lap and is then able to start the extra formation lap, he must enter the Pit Lane at the end of the lap and start from the Pit Lane. It is only then, if the driver fails to do this, that the mandatory penalty of a Stop and Go penalty is imposed.
"In other words, the penalty is for failing to come into the Pit Lane and start from there. The penalty is not for causing the extra formation lap, if indeed, he caused the extra formation lap in the first place.
"A critical issue emerges here, in that in order to comply with the requirement to enter and start from the Pit Lane, a driver would need to know that he was the cause of the extra formation lap."
The stewards added: "The team, based on the fact that the car was positioned within its starting grid box in compliance with the regulations, had, in our determination, no reason to instruct its driver to enter and start from the Pit Lane.
"Accordingly, irrespective of whether or not the driver directly caused the extra formation lap, the team and driver were unaware that they were being considered as the cause, therefore we determine that we are unable to impose a Stop and Go penalty in this case, and decide to take no further action."
Motorsport.com ·
内容来自公开信源，聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。