斯特拉怒斥布里亚托雷“侮辱性”指控 上诉法院就摩纳哥领奖台作出裁决
阿尔派车手皮埃尔·加斯利的两罚加时被重新执行，失去摩纳哥大奖赛第三名，迈凯伦和红牛在国际上诉法院胜诉。迈凯伦领队安德烈亚·斯特拉称阿尔派负责人弗拉维奥·布里亚托雷的指控是对迈凯伦的“侮辱”。
安德烈亚·斯特拉表示，在法庭就摩纳哥领奖台作出裁决后，阿尔派车队负责人弗拉维奥·布里亚托利的指控对迈凯伦来说是一种'侮辱'
红牛车队的伊萨克·哈贾尔在阿尔派车手皮埃尔·加斯利的时间处罚被重新执行后，恢复了摩纳哥大奖赛第三名的成绩；迈凯伦和红牛在FIA国际上诉法院赢得了此案；周六下午3点请通过天空体育 F1收看意大利大奖赛排位赛直播
迈凯伦车队领队安德烈亚·斯特拉对弗拉维奥·布里亚托利对裁决的反应感到不满，该裁决意味着在阿尔派车手皮埃尔·加斯利的两处时间处罚被重新执行后，他失去了摩纳哥大奖赛第三名的成绩
安德烈亚·斯特拉指责阿尔派车队领队弗拉维奥·布里亚托利通过质疑卫冕车队冠军迈凯伦与FIA国际上诉法院一名法官之间的关系，是在"侮辱"迈凯伦。
该法院于周五宣布，阿尔派车手皮埃尔·加斯利在六月的摩纳哥大奖赛期间所受的处罚将被恢复执行，此前迈凯伦和红牛的上诉获得成功。
加斯利以第三名冲过方格旗，但因在维修区内超速被处以两次五秒处罚而降级。然而，阿尔派提出复审请求后，该处罚在五天后被撤销。
意大利大奖赛：赛程安排及天空体育观看方式
F1 2026 积分榜 | F1 2026 赛历 | F1 八卦专栏
下载 天空体育 应用，获取专业分析、最佳视频及更多内容📱
没有 Sky？查看最新 天空体育 优惠，或无合约在线观看 F1 📺
该处罚的恢复执行使 Gasly 在官方排名中回落至第七位。红牛车队的 哈贾尔 获得第三名登上领奖台，而迈凯伦车队的 皮亚斯特里 则上升至第四位。
在红牛提出上诉后，哈贾尔 重新获得了摩纳哥站的领奖台位置，而 阿尔派 对此表示不满，因为 Gasly 因在维修区超速而被恢复处罚
在本周末的意大利大奖赛上，一场火药味十足的新闻发布会上——巧的是 阿尔派 高级顾问 Briatore 和迈凯伦车队领队 Stella 都出席了——双方发生了引人瞩目的激烈冲突。
在该裁决公布后不久，阿尔派 发表声明对结果表示“失望”，但同时也表示车队“认可近期在巴黎举行的听证会上评审团的决定”。
布里亚托雷在仅仅几个小时后的新闻发布会上出人意料地改变了基调，他抱怨称听证会的四名评委中有一人与迈凯伦存在"工作关系"。
"首先，这非常不公平，但我们接受这个决定，"布里亚托雷说。"但非常奇怪的是评审团中的第三位评委，其中一名评委的行为就像检察官一样。"
红牛车队领队洛朗·梅基斯对哈贾尔在摩纳哥大奖赛中被恢复至第三名的消息作出反应
“就这一点来说，不是什么大问题。问题是，他与迈凯伦公司关系非常密切。”
布里亚托利指出此人曾在2018年出席加州的一场慈善活动，他声称当时“三辆迈凯伦车中有两辆”被捐赠了出去。
“我们有一张这家伙在2018年迈凯伦活动演讲现场的照片，拍得很清楚，”布里亚托利说。
“当时有一位法官与一支抗议我们的车队有关联，这是相当不公平的。”
布里亚托利补充说，该法官在听证会上对阿尔派的代表“非常刻薄”，并表示他的团队正在“考虑”采取法律行动。
国际上诉法院“对程序的正当性和法官的公正性充满信心”
国际上诉法院于周六上午发表声明，表示它“已注意到公众对法官小组成员的独立性和公正性提出质疑的评论”。
声明继续说道：“FIA法院希望明确指出，与其他任何案件一样，该案中法官的任命和参与都是按照适用的FIA司法程序和惯例进行的，这些程序和惯例遵循最高标准，例如国际律师协会国际仲裁利益冲突准则。”
"所有评委均由国际汽联（FIA）代表大会选举产生，其中一些是根据国际汽联章程，由至少五支F1车队组成的团体提名而选举产生的。他们都须遵守《国际汽联司法与纪律规则》中规定的独立性和保密性要求，每年向国际汽联合规官披露利益情况，并针对每一个具体案件，结合所涉问题和有关各方，签署一份专门的独立性声明，该声明会送达各方当事人。
"在听证会的开始和结束时，双方当事人都被邀请就诉讼程序或法庭组成提出任何问题。双方均未提出。在听证会期间，也没有人对法庭询问证人或主持诉讼程序的方式提出任何异议。
"国际汽联上诉法院（ICA）强调由来自不同文化和地域背景的评委组成合议庭的重要性。这有助于确保审议和讨论反映多元的法律传统、观点和方法，进一步增强程序的公正性、独立性和可信度，以及获得公平审判的机会。
"法庭的裁决在法律依据方面可能留有多种解释和评论的空间；这是公平的，并为所有评委所接受。法庭对诉讼程序的稳妥性和评委的公正廉正充满信心。国际汽联法庭将继续致力于维护评委的独立性与公正性，以及司法程序的完整性。
据天空体育新闻了解，迈凯伦认为自己与涉事法官没有任何关联。
斯特拉：迈凯伦理应得到大量尊重
斯特拉起初选择不对布里亚托利的言论作出回应，但最终似乎以采取法律行动威胁这位意大利同胞。
“我发现这场发布会正朝着这个方向发展，这对迈凯伦、对一支理应得到大量尊重的车队的声誉来说是相当具有侮辱性的，”斯特拉说。
“而且，如果有人提出这种看起来相当严重的指控，他们将必须在公开场合为自己所说的话承担责任。”
天空体育 F1 的 Karun Chandhok 解释了为什么 Gasly 在摩纳哥大奖赛收到的处罚此前会被撤销
“这场听证会，整个国际上诉法院的审理都是按照最高标准进行的。我们不应该质疑这一空间，就像之前已经做过的那样。”
英文原文
Andrea Stella says allegations from Alpine chief Flavio Briatore are 'insulting' for McLaren after court rules on Monaco podium
Red Bull’s Isack Hadjar restored to third in Monaco GP after Alpine driver Pierre Gasly’s time penalties were reapplied; McLaren and Red Bull won case at FIA's International Court of Appeal; watch Italian GP Qualifying live on Sky Sports F1 at 3pm on Saturday
McLaren's Team Principal Andrea Stella was not happy with Flavio Briatore's reaction to the ruling which meant Alpine's Pierre Gasly lost his Monaco GP third place finish after his two time penalties were reapplied
Andrea Stella has accused Alpine chief Flavio Briatore of "insulting" McLaren by questioning the relationship between the reigning constructors' champions and a judge at the FIA's International Court of Appeal.
The court announced on Friday that penalties given to Alpine driver Pierre Gasly during June's Monaco Grand Prix would be reinstated, following a successful appeal by McLaren and Red Bull.
Gasly took the chequered flag in third but was demoted when two five-second penalties for speeding in the pit lane were applied at that point. However, a right of review appeal from Alpine saw the penalties withdrawn five days later.
Italian GP: Schedule and how to watch on Sky Sports
F1 2026 standings | F1 2026 calendar | F1 Gossip Column
Download the Sky Sports app for expert analysis, best video & more📱
Not got Sky? Latest Sky Sports deals or stream F1 with no contract 📺
The reinstatement of the penalty drops Gasly back to seventh in the official classification. Red Bull's Isack Hadjar gets a podium in third, while McLaren's Oscar Piastri moves up to fourth.
Isack Hadjar was reinstated to the Monaco podium after a Red Bull appeal with Alpine expressing frustration as Gasly's penalty for speeding in pit lane was restored
In an explosive press conference at this weekend's Italian Grand Prix, which coincidentally featured Alpine executive advisor Briatore and McLaren team principal Stella, the pair engaged in a remarkable clash.
Alpine had put out a statement moments after the decision was announced expressing "disappointment" with the outcome but also said that the team "acknowledges the decision of the judging panel from the recent hearing in Paris".
Briatore stunned the room by striking a different tone in the press conference just a couple of hours later as he complained that one of the four judges at the hearing had a "working relationship" with McLaren.
"It's very unfair, firstly, but we accept the decision," Briatore said. "But what is very strange was the third judge in the panel, one of the judges acted like a prosecutor.
Red Bull Team Principal Laurent Mekies reacts to news that Hadjar had been restored to third in the Monaco GP
"For this, not a big problem. The problem is, he is very linked with the McLaren company."
Briatore pointed to the individual's presence at a charity event in California in 2018, at which he claimed "two of three McLaren cars" were donated.
"We have a nice picture of this guy at the speech for McLaren in 2018," Briatore said.
"It was quite unfair that one of the judges was linked with a team protesting us."
Briatore added that the judge in question was "very nasty" to Alpine's representatives during the hearing, and said that his team were "thinking about" taking legal action.
ICA 'confident in the soundness of the proceedings and the integrity of the judges'
The International Court of Appeal issued a statement on Saturday morning, saying it was "aware of public comments questioning the independence and impartiality of the judges of the panel".
The statement continued: "The FIA Courts wish to make clear that the appointment and participation of the judges in that case, like for any other case, were conducted in accordance with the applicable FIA judicial procedures and usual practice, which are inspired by the highest standards like the IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration.
"All judges are elected by the FIA General Assemblies, some of them upon proposition of a group of at least five F1 teams in accordance with the FIA Statutes. They are all subject to the independence and confidentiality requirements contained in the FIA Judicial and Disciplinary Rules, make annual disclosures of interests to the FIA Compliance Officer, and sign a specific declaration of independence for each particular case in consideration of the issue at stake and the parties involved, which is served to the parties.
"At both the beginning and conclusion of the hearing, the parties were invited to raise any issue concerning the proceedings or the composition of the Court. None did so. No objection was raised during the hearing concerning the manner in which the Court questioned the witness or conducted the proceedings.
"The ICA emphasises the importance of constituting panels with judges from different cultural and geographical backgrounds. This helps ensure that the deliberations and discussions reflect a diversity of legal traditions, perspectives and approaches, further strengthening the fairness, independence, credibility of the process and access to a fair trial.
"A Court's decision can leave room for various interpretations and comments as for its legal merits; that is fair and accepted by all the judges. The Court is confident in the soundness of the proceedings and the integrity of the judges. The FIA Courts remain committed to the independence and impartiality of their judges and to the integrity of the judicial process.
Sky Sports News also understands that McLaren consider they have no connection with the judge in question.
Stella: McLaren deserve a lot of respect
Stella initially chose not to respond to Briatore's comments, but eventually appeared to threaten his fellow Italian with legal action.
"I find that this conference is going in this direction quite insulting for McLaren, for the reputation of a team that deserves a lot of respect," Stella said.
"And if anybody makes this kind of allegations, which seem quite serious, they are going to have to take the responsibility for what they are saying in a public forum.
Sky Sports F1's Karun Chandhok explains why Gasly's Monaco GP penalties were previously overturned
"The hearing, the whole international court of appeal was conducted to the highest standards. We should not question this space, like it's been done."
Sky Sports F1 ·
内容来自公开信源，聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。