← 返回资讯流

F1 中英提炼 · 公开详情

  1. 赛事新闻

    FIA承认新加坡F1冲刺排位赛公平性受损

    FIA承认在新加坡大奖赛的单车排位赛中出现人为错误,影响公平性。

    FIA承认公平性受损在新加坡F1冲刺排位赛“混乱”中

    FIA的单车总监Nikolas Tombazis解释了在新加坡大奖赛冲刺排位赛中的最新失误

    FIA再次承认在新加坡大奖赛中出现人为错误,其单车总监Nikolas Tombazis将其描述为联盟的“最糟糕的事情”

    在Sergio Perez的撞车事故后,由于维修区首先未能重新激活超车模式,然后又将其关闭27秒并再次激活,SQ1的结束受到了影响

    车手们对动力不足感到困惑,那些在冲刺排位赛第一阶段被淘汰的车手们觉得他们受到了不公平的对待。

    在接受天空体育德国采访时,托马齐斯指出“在赛事控制中心同时发生了很多事情”,并解释了错误是如何发生的。

    “通常情况下,重新启用它是一个手动过程,因为很明显,当我们重新启用时,我们想确保从安全角度来看这样做是安全的,”他详细说明了。

    “不幸的是,有人电脑上出现了一个弹出窗口,没有及时处理,或者没有在应该处理的时候处理。然后在时间压力和一般其他压力下,这被忘记了,很不幸。”

    “我们随后进行了一次相当深入的分析,因为我们可以听到,当然,车手们正在抱怨并说出了发生的事情。我们意识到问题在哪里。”

    “当时有一个错误的决定,就是暂时再次开启它,但这并不是为了公平而做出的完全正确的决定。然后它又被关闭了。”

    托马齐斯接着承认,鉴于其对竞争秩序的影响,情况“相当混乱”,坦白说。”

    “我们对此并不满意,因为它对一些车手的影响更大,而对另一些车手的影响较小,”他补充道。

    “因此,在冲刺赛的第一节练习中,我们就感觉这个问题干扰了结果——对我们FIA来说,这可能是最糟糕的事情之一,因为我们的首要任务始终是安全和公平。”

    “当然,出现结果不公平或不正确的情况对我们来说不是什么好事。当然,这是一项复杂的工作,人们会犯错误,我们需要意识到这一点。但我们也需要在犯错时分析它们,并确保它们不再发生——这正是我们正在做的事情。”

    “这个错误发生在马来西亚巴林大奖赛因多个竞争对手的引擎问题而中断后不到一周的时间,这要求在比赛开始前对所有车辆的软件进行更新。”

    英文原文

    FIA admits fairness was compromised in Singapore F1 sprint qualifying “mess”

    The FIA's single-seater director Nikolas Tombazis explains what happened in latest blunder during Singapore GP sprint qualifying

    The FIA has again owned up to its human error at Formula 1’s Singapore Grand Prix, with its single-seater director Nikolas Tombazis describing it as “the worst thing” for the federation.

    After sprint qualifying was red-flagged following Sergio Perez’s crash, the end of SQ1 was impacted by race control first failing to reactivate overtake mode, then turning it back on for 27 seconds and deactivating it again.

    Drivers were puzzled by the lack of power, and those who were eliminated in that first phase of sprint qualifying felt they unfairly came off worse.

    Speaking to Sky Germany, Tombazis pointed out “there’s a lot of things happening in race control simultaneously” and explained how the mistake happened.

    “Normally it is a manual process to re-enable it, because clearly when it gets re-enabled we want to make sure from a safety point of view it's okay to do so,” he detailed.

    “Unfortunately, there was a pop-up window that came on somebody's computer that was not acted on quickly enough or when it should have. And then under the time pressure and the general other pressure, this was forgotten, unfortunately.

    “We then went into quite an intense analysis about, was there some other issue, because we could hear, of course, the drivers complaining and saying what's happening. We realised where the problem was.

    “At that time there was an erroneous decision to briefly turn it on again, but that was sort of not exactly the correct decision in order for fairness. And then it was turned off again.”

    Tombazis went on to admit the situation was “a bit of a mess, quite frankly”, given its impact on the competitive order.

    “We're not happy about it, because it affected some drivers more and some drivers less,” he added.

    “So as a result, just in the first session of the sprint, we felt this problem interfered with the results – which for us as FIA is probably, in some ways, the worst thing, because our top priorities are always safety and fairness.

    “Of course, to have a situation where a result is not fair or incorrect is for us not good. Of course, it is a complicated job, and people do make mistakes, and we need to be conscious of that. But we also need, when we do make mistakes, to analyse them and to make sure they don't happen again – which is what we're doing.”

    This blunder occurred less than a week after the Bahrain Grand Prix in Malaysia was disrupted by a power unit glitch for a number of competitors, which required the software to be updated on all cars before the race could get under way.

    Motorsport.com ·

    查看原文 →

    内容来自公开信源,聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。

公开资讯页面,通过同源公开 API 读取已发布内容。