布里亚托雷就上诉法院法官与迈凯伦爆发激烈争执
阿尔派车队执行顾问弗拉维奥·布里亚托雷就国际上诉法院恢复对皮埃尔·加斯利摩纳哥大奖赛处罚的决定，与迈凯伦爆发激烈争执，并质疑其中一名法官的公正性。
阿尔派一级方程式车队的执行顾问弗拉维奥·布里亚托利就国际上诉法院恢复对皮埃尔·加斯利摩纳哥大奖赛处罚并剥夺其领奖台成绩的决定，与迈凯伦爆发了一场非同寻常的争执。
布里亚托利似乎质疑了国际上诉法院在审理迈凯伦和红牛对取消加斯利摩纳哥维修区超速处罚的决定提出上诉时，所任命的其中一名法官。
在阿尔派通过复审成功推翻加斯利的两项超速处罚后，加斯利被重新提升回摩纳哥大奖赛的领奖台位置，这两项处罚原本是在方格旗挥出时施加的，但红牛和迈凯伦随后提起的上诉导致加斯利在最终排名中又被降回第七位，而红牛的伊萨克·哈贾尔则被重新提升回第三名。
在周五的意大利大奖赛车队领队新闻发布会上，布里亚托利挥舞着一张纸照着念，似乎质疑了8月听证会评审团中一名国际上诉法院法官——菲利波·马尔基诺——的公正性。
布里亚托利说：“首先，我们接受这个决定，但非常奇怪的是，在陪审团的四位裁判中，有一位裁判的行为就像一名检察官。”
“对我们来说，这不是一个大问题。问题在于他与迈凯伦这家公司关系非常密切，因为我们有一张这家伙的照片，那是2018年他在比佛利山庄的迈凯伦特别行动部门（MSO）为迈凯伦演讲时拍的。”
“他有一个基金会——叫做One Drop基金会——迈凯伦捐赠了两三辆迈凯伦汽车。”
“而我认为这相当不公平，其中一位裁判竟然与抗议我们的车队有关联。”
这些都是布里亚托雷提出的指控。马尔基诺未出席回应这些指控。
马尔基诺在国际汽联的简介中被称为一位“经验丰富的诉讼律师”，他“经常在美国办理一些最具技术性和挑战性的案件”。
在2023年12月的国际汽联大会上，他被列入当选国际汽联国际法庭和国际上诉法院法官的名单。
布里亚托雷辩称“法官通常应当是完全独立的”，并继续声称马尔基诺在听证过程中“非常刻薄”，而且“表现得像个检察官”。
布里亚托利继续说道："还有，后来我们发现了这个人为什么这么刻薄的原因是什么。他和迈凯伦关系非常密切。我很惊讶这个人居然和迈凯伦有关系。"
同样出席新闻发布会的迈凯伦车队领队斯特拉随后反驳道："我发现这场发布会正朝着对迈凯伦非常侮辱性的方向发展，对一个值得高度尊重的车队的名誉造成了伤害。
"如果有人提出这种看起来相当严重的指控，他们将必须为自己在公开场合所说的话承担责任。
"听证会，整个国际上诉法院，都是以最高标准进行的，我们不应该像现在这样质疑这个案子。"
有人问布里亚托利，为什么阿尔派没有质疑马尔基诺进入ICA审理小组一事。
“我们完全不知道这个人和迈凯伦有关系，”布里亚托利回答道。“我们去参加与迈凯伦的听证会时，我们才发现……这非常可笑，因为那位法官根本不是法官，他是一名检察官。”
“当时一共有四位法官，而这位实际上是针对FIA、针对我们、针对一级方程式管理公司的检察官。在那之后，也就是在与马尔基诺会面之后，我们才发现这个人和迈凯伦车队有关联。”
“所以这非常不公平，如果有些法官与正在和我们竞争的车队有关系的话。”
布里亚托雷反复强调，阿尔派 "接受这个决定，我们接受一切"，但他又回到了他所认为的利益冲突这一话题上，说道："这相当奇怪——评审团里居然有一个与车队有关联的人。"
对于车队是否正在考虑进一步的司法审查，他的表态含糊其辞，只说"我们在考虑下一步该怎么做"。
英文原文
The Alpine Formula 1 team's executive advisor Flavio Briatore has started an extraordinary row with McLaren over the International Court of Appeal's decision to reinstate Pierre Gasly's Monaco Grand Prix penalties and strip him of his podium finish.
Briatore appeared to question the appointment of one of the ICA judges presiding over McLaren and Red Bull's appeal against the decision to rescind Gasly's Monaco pitlane speeding penalties.
Gasly was promoted back into the Monaco GP podium places after Alpine succeeded in a right of review appeal against his two speeding penalties, which were applied at the chequered flag, but a further appeal launched by Red Bull and McLaren led to Gasly being demoted back to seventh in the final classification, and Red Bull's Isack Hadjar promoted back to third.
Reading from a piece of paper that he waved around during Friday's Italian GP team bosses' press conference, Briatore appeared to question the impartiality of one of the ICA judges - Filippo Marchino - on the panel during the August hearing.
"First, we accept the decision, but what is very strange is, of the four judges on the panel, one of the judges acts like a prosecutor," Briatore said.
"For us, that's not a big problem. The problem is that he's very linked with McLaren, the company, because we have a nice picture of this guy at the speech for McLaren in 2018 at McLaren Special Operations [MSO] in Beverly Hills.
"He has a foundation - it's called the One Drop Foundation - and McLaren gave two or three McLaren cars.
"And I think this was quite unfair, [that] one of the judges was linked with a team protesting us."
These are all accusations made by Briatore. Marchino was not present to respond to them.
Marchino's FIA biography calls him an "experienced trial Attorney" who "routinely litigates some of the most technical and challenging cases in the United States".
He was added to the list of judges elected to the FIA international tribunal and International Court of Appeal in the December 2023 FIA General Assembly.
Briatore argued "the judge normally would be independent, completely" and continued by claiming that Marchino was "very nasty during the hearing" and "acting as a prosecutor".
Briatore continued: "And after, we found out what is the reason why he's so nasty, this guy? He's very linked with McLaren. I'm very surprised this guy has the link with McLaren."
McLaren team principal Stella, also present in the press conference, later rebutted: "I find that this conference is going, in this direction, quite insulting for McLaren, for the reputation of a team that deserves a lot of respect.
"If anybody makes these kind of allegations, which seem quite serious, they are going to have to take the responsibility for what they are saying in a public forum.
"The hearing, the whole International Court of Appeal, was conducted to the highest standards, and we should not question this case like it's been done."
Briatore was asked why Alpine did not question the inclusion of Marchino on the ICA panel.
“We had no idea this guy was linked with McLaren," Briatore replied. "We go to the hearing with McLaren, and we see...it was very funny, because the judge was not a judge, he was a prosecutor.
"It was four judges, this one was really a prosecutor against the FIA, against us, against FOM [Formula One Management]. And after that, we found out, after the meeting with Marchino before, we found out this guy was linked with the McLaren team.
"So it's quite unfair, if some of the judge is linked with one of the teams that fighting with us."
Briatore repeatedly insisted that Alpine "accept the decision, we accept everything" but returned to his theme of a perceived conflict of interest, saying: "It's quite strange - to have one guy in the panel linked to the team.”
He was vague on whether his team is considering further judicial review, saying only "we're thinking about what we do next".
The Race ·
内容来自公开信源，聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。