法拉利车队指令引争议 汉密尔顿不满赞德福特站执行
荷兰大奖赛期间，刘易斯·汉密尔顿因被队友勒克莱尔阻挡而愈发沮丧，并公开批评法拉利的比赛执行，将其与梅赛德斯的策略安排作对比。
法拉利对一级方程式车队指令的处理方式，在赞德沃特举行的荷兰大奖赛期间和之后再次成为热议话题，刘易斯·汉密尔顿批评了车队在比赛中的执行，认为与梅赛德斯的应对方式相比有所不足。
汉密尔顿的不满在赞德沃特比赛的第二段（阶段）中爆发，他觉得自己跟在队友夏尔·勒克莱尔身后损失了时间——勒克莱尔用的是稍微旧一些的中性胎，而汉密尔顿用的是硬胎。
当汉密尔顿提出这个问题后，勒克莱尔被召进站（pit），但他第一次没有照做，汉密尔顿变得越来越恼火。等勒克莱尔终于进站让出位置后，他通过无线电说：“真是损失时间的好办法，伙计们，干得好！”
车队领队弗雷德·瓦塞尔并不认为那一刻对汉密尔顿当时的比赛走势起了关键作用，因为当时的考虑是让他留在赛道上直到比赛结束——所以所谓的损失时间本来就无关紧要。
但虚拟安全车让汉密尔顿获得了一次“打折”的进站，这改变了他整场比赛的走向。
在勒克莱尔进站之前，汉密尔顿紧跟在他后面的两圈似乎让他损失了大约1.5到2秒，而在方格旗挥下之后，这段时间损失仍然萦绕在他心头——因为他最终以微弱差距未能超越拉塞尔拿下第三名。
汉密尔顿多次表示，他认为在队友身后被耽误的那一刻正是第三名和第四名之间的差距所在。
他形容这场比赛“对我来说绝对令人沮丧”，并且一边反复强调称赞法拉利的升级，一边多次指出他的老东家梅赛德斯在处理拉塞尔与安东内利换车问题上的表现形成了令人失望的对比。
"这很难，当你看向前方，看到两位梅赛德斯车手——他们接到指令，事情就完成了，立刻执行,"他向F1电视（F1 TV）抱怨道。
"他们让基米（Kimi）过去，让他继续跑比赛。
"而我当时和勒克莱尔（Charles）用的是不同策略——在这里情况并不一样。这有点难接受——但我们会线下处理。等我回去后，我会和他们谈谈这件事。"
与此同时，勒克莱尔也谈不上高兴。
法拉利从未下达过交换位置的指令，但正如上文所提到的，车队确实让他进站，以此作为应对当时局面的替代方案。
勒克莱尔对这一策略并不信服，这也是他在执行指令时犹豫不决的关键因素。在那段赛程（阶段）中他一直跟在拉塞尔身后，对于在拉塞尔进站两圈之后才被召进站感到困惑，认为这与拉开对梅赛德斯车手轮胎差距的逻辑相违背。
虽然他在赛后承认随后的虚拟安全车时机让他运气不佳，但他在赛后仍然对第二次进站提出质疑。
"对我来说，拉开与梅赛德斯的轮胎差距非常重要，这样才能在比赛末段强势追赶。我们没能完全做到这一点，所以我们需要看看原因是什么，"他说。
“我当时非常惊讶，因为我们完全按计划进行时却被要求这么早进站。拉塞尔正在进站，那时候正是我们多跑五到十圈、建立轮胎优势、最后在尾声反超拉塞尔的时机。”
当被问及汉密尔顿的沮丧时，他说：“我的第一段非常出色，我不得不提前进站，试图对前面的车手进行反向进站超越（提前进站），有时候这是车队的一种策略博弈。为此，你必须让自己承担一点风险，尤其是在第一段。刘易斯在第二段非常强势，但事情就是这样。”
“我认为有时候我会感到沮丧，有时候刘易斯会感到沮丧，但事情就是如此。”
勒克莱尔还表示，关于他的进站时机“我认为并没有太多争论”。“起初我被要求进站，然后在那圈快结束时我被要求留在赛道上，我照做了，一圈之后我又被要求进站。”
不过，这与他在F1 TV电台频道上可查到的证据有些相悖。
BB[布莱恩·博齐，比赛工程师]：进站，勒克莱尔，进站。
CL：你说的进站是什么意思？为什么在拉塞尔之后两圈才停？
BB[又一次停顿]：勒克莱尔，我们要你进站。
勒克莱尔完成了一圈，没有进站。
BB：那么，进站，夏尔，进站。将换硬胎。再加两格。
证据表明，勒克莱尔当时有足够的时间——虽然不算充裕——来回应那句“我们要进站”，因此在汉密尔顿被阻挡一事中起到了一定作用。但他也可能听错了那条信息，或者希望得到进一步的确认——一圈之后他没有再多争辩，顺从地进了站。
然而，这一情况可能暴露出的是，法拉利的两位车手对车队当前的总冠军形势持有截然不同的看法。
汉密尔顿对天空体育F1频道说：“我来这里是为了取胜，我真心相信这支车队能够赢得胜利。我们本来赢不下这场比赛——但要想赢得总冠军，你就必须拿下每一个积分。”
他在与文字媒体的见面会上还意味深长地提到了一件他与安东内利共同拥有的东西——那就是在积分榜上担任车队头号车手的地位。
不过，汉密尔顿目前落后安东内利59分，领先勒克莱尔28分，因此目前没有任何迹象表明法拉利会优先考虑汉密尔顿在车手总冠军上的收益而牺牲勒克莱尔的成绩——当然也完全看不到勒克莱尔会以牺牲自己的利益为代价来帮助汉密尔顿的迹象。
英文原文
Ferrari's approach to Formula 1 team orders became a talking point again during and after the Dutch Grand Prix at Zandvoort, with Lewis Hamilton criticising his team's execution of the race relative to how Mercedes played its cards.
Hamilton's frustration boiled over during the second stint of the Zandvoort race, as he felt he was losing time behind his team-mate Charles Leclerc - who was on marginally older medium tyres versus Hamilton's hards.
Once Hamilton raised the issue, Leclerc was called into the pits, but didn't comply at the first time of asking, and Hamilton grew increasingly exasperated. Once Leclerc did pit out of the way, he radioed: "Great way of losing time, guys, good job!"
Team boss Fred Vasseur did not feel that moment was key to how Hamilton's race was playing out at the time, given the consideration was to keep him out there until the finish - and so the time loss in question would have been immaterial.
But the virtual safety car giving Hamilton a 'discounted' pitstop changed the complexion of his race.
The earlier two laps right behind Leclerc before he pitted appeared to cost Hamilton around 1.5-2s before he pitted, and that time loss was still firmly on his mind after the chequered flag - as he came up just short of picking off George Russell for third place.
Hamilton repeatedly indicated that he felt that moment of delay behind his team-mate was the difference between third and fourth.
He described the race as "definitely frustrating for me" and, while repeatedly making a point of lauding Ferrari's upgrades, repeatedly pointed to his former team Mercedes's handling of the George Russell-Kimi Antonelli swap as a disappointing contrast.
"It is difficult, when you're looking ahead and you see the two Mercedes drivers - they get the call, and it's done, they execute straight away," he vented to F1 TV.
"They let Kimi by and let him get on with the race.
"And I was on a different strategy [to Charles] - and it's not the same here. And that's a little bit difficult - but we'll take it off-line. When I go back now, I'll speak to them about it."
Leclerc, meanwhile, was hardly happy either.
Ferrari never ordered a swap, but it did, as mentioned above, call him into the pits as an alternate solution to the situation.
Leclerc was unconvinced by this strategy, which was the key factor in his dawdling over the order. He had sat behind Russell in that stint, and was perplexed to be called in two laps after Russell's own pitstop, believing it ran counter to the logic of building a tyre offset to the Mercedes driver.
While he acknowledged after the race that he got unlucky with the subsequent virtual safety car timing, he continued to question that second pitstop after the race.
"For me, it was very important to create a tyre delta to the Mercedes in order to come back strong at the end. We didn't quite do that, so we need to look at why," he said.
"I was very surprised to box so early when we had done exactly what we wanted. George was pitting and so that was the time for us to do five, 10 laps longer to build a tyre delta and to come back at the end on George."
When quizzed about Hamilton's frustrations, he said: "I had a very good first stint, I had to stop early to try and undercut the guys in front and that's a bit of a team game sometimes. You've got to put yourself a little bit at risk, especially in the first stint, for that. Lewis was very strong in the second stint, but it's the way it goes.
"I think sometimes I'll be frustrated, sometimes Lewis will be frustrated, but it's the way it is."
Leclerc also said "I don't think there was much debate" over his pit timing. "At first I was asked to stop and then towards the end of the lap I was asked to stay on track, which I did, and the lap later I was asked to stop."
This, though, runs somewhat counter to the available evidence from his radio channel on F1 TV.
BB [Bryan Bozzi, race engineer]: Box, Charles, box.
CL: What do you mean box-box? Why stop two laps after Russell?
BB [another pause]: Charles, we want to box.
Leclerc finishes the lap without pitting
BB: So, box, Charles, box. Will be for hard. Plus two clicks.
The evidence is that Leclerc had enough time - though not a huge amount - to respond to that "we want to box" and thus played his role in Hamilton being held up. But he could've perhaps misheard that message or hoped for further clarification - and he acquiesced a lap later without further debate.
What the situation has potentially exposed, however, is a different view altogether on Ferrari's current championship situation between its two drivers.
"I'm here to win and I really believe that this team can win. We couldn't win this race - but to win championships you have to pick up every point," Hamilton told Sky F1.
He also made a very pointed reference in his session with the written media to something he shares with Antonelli - the status of being the team's leading driver in the points standings.
But with Hamilton 59 points down on Antonelli and 28 up on Leclerc, there is currently no indication of Ferrari prioritising Hamilton's drivers' championship yield over Leclerc's - and certainly no sign of Leclerc trying to lend a helping hand at his own expense.
The Race ·
内容来自公开信源，聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。