科拉平托巴库引发连环相撞被罚马来西亚大奖赛退后五位发车
弗朗哥·科拉平托因在巴库阿塞拜疆大奖赛中引发连环相撞，被处以马来西亚大奖赛退后五位发车的处罚。
弗朗哥·科拉平托在巴库引发F1连环相撞的处罚揭晓
在科拉平托于阿塞拜疆出现失误后，赛干事已公布其裁决
由于在今天于巴库举行的F1比赛中引发连环相撞事故，弗朗哥·科拉平托被处以马来西亚大奖赛发车退后五位发车的处罚。
当亚历山大·阿尔本在比赛过半后不久撞车退赛时，阿塞拜疆大奖赛出动安全车进行了中立化，但在重新起步时，科拉平托在内侧出现了极其严重的锁死。这位阿尔卑车手猛然撞上皮埃尔·加斯利的同队赛车，后者随后又撞上了兰多·诺里斯的迈凯伦。
怒不可遏的诺里斯呼吁对科拉平托处以禁赛一场的处罚——需要指出的是，他是在观看事故回放之前就这么说的——但赛事干事最终选择对他处以10秒罚时，由于犯规者未能完成今天的比赛，这一处罚被转换为在雪邦大奖赛正赛中退后五位发车。
“赛事干事观看了视频、计时以及车内视频证据，”赛事干事的报告写道。
“比赛重新开始后，科拉平托从后方接近加斯利，进入1号弯。科拉平托刹车过晚，以一个无法让他受控过弯的速度从内侧进入弯道。他冲出了弯道，并与加斯利的左侧发生碰撞，随后加斯利又撞上了诺里斯，两辆车都退赛了。
“赛事干事认为，这次碰撞完全或主要由科拉平托负责。尽管事故发生在重新发车后的第一个弯角，但没有其他车手的责任因素，因此不适用第一圈/第一个弯角较为宽松的处理方式。
“引发碰撞的标准处罚是10秒加时处罚。由于科拉平托已从比赛中退赛，因此无法执行该加时处罚，干事们根据国际汽联2026年F1规则第B1.9.6.(e)条，将该处罚转换为该车手下一场参赛比赛发车位置后退5位。”
阿尔维德·林布拉德，小红牛车队；利亚姆·劳森，小红牛车队
与此同时，干事们解释了为什么他们对阿尔维德·林布拉德在同一时间打转并撞上小红牛队友利亚姆·劳森的事件没有采取进一步行动——原因是该事故受到了科拉平托撞车事件的影响。
““重新发车后，林（LIN）和劳（LAW）驶向1号弯，林（LIN）处于三车并行的局面，”他们写道。
“在他们前方，COL、GAS 和 NOR 之间发生了一次碰撞。这起事故，加上 COL 刹车抱死，引发了在 LIN 前方紧邻车辆的一系列制动反应。与此同时，LIN 正处于两侧都有车的位置。”
“在过弯过程中，LIN 与 LAW 发生了接触。在审查了相关车辆的相对位置和移动情况后，干事们认定，这次接触主要是由于 LIN 所处空间受限，以及前方事故引发的连锁反应所致，而不是任何可以全部或主要归咎于 LIN 的动作或失误。”
“因此，干事们认为这属于重新起跑后典型的一号弯事故，没有哪位车手应承担主要责任。”
英文原文
Franco Colapinto penalty revealed for causing Baku F1 pile-up
The stewards have made their verdict public following Colapinto’s blunder in Azerbaijan
Franco Colapinto has been given a five-place grid penalty for the Malaysian Grand Prix, following the pile-up he caused in today’s Formula 1 race at Baku.
The Azerbaijan GP was neutralised by the safety car when Alexander Albon crashed out shortly after mid-race, but Colapinto had a monumental lock-up on the inside at the restart. The Alpine driver careened into Pierre Gasly’s sister car, which in turn crashed into Lando Norris’ McLaren.
A livid Norris called for Colapinto to get a race ban – one should point out he did so before viewing a replay of the incident – but the stewards opted for a 10-second penalty, which they converted into a five-place grid drop for the Sepang race, given the offender failed to finish today’s event.
“The Stewards reviewed video, timing and in-car video evidence,” the stewards’ report read.
“Following the restart, COL approached GAS from behind into Turn 1. COL braked too late and entered the corner on the inside at a speed which did not allow him to make the corner in a controlled manner. He overshot the corner and made contact with the left-hand side of GAS, who then hit NOR and both cars retired.
“The Stewards considered that COL was wholly or predominantly to blame for the collision. Although the incident occurred at the first corner following the restart, there was no contribution from another driver which would justify applying the first-lap / [first-corner] more [lenient] approach.
“The standard penalty for causing a collision is a 10-second time penalty. As COL had retired from the Race and was therefore unable to serve the time penalty, the Stewards converted the penalty to a drop of 5 grid positions at the next Race in which the driver participates in accordance which Article B1.9.6.(e) of the FIA 2026 F1 Regulations.”
Arvid Lindblad, Racing Bulls, Liam Lawson, Racing Bulls
Meanwhile, the stewards have explained why they took no further action on Arvid Lindblad spinning his Racing Bulls team-mate Liam Lawson at the exact same time – the reason being that incident was influenced by the Colapinto shunt.
“Following the restart, LIN and LAW approached Turn 1, with LIN in a three-car situation,” they wrote.
“Ahead of them, a collision occurred involving COL, GAS and NOR. That incident, together with COL locking his brakes, triggered a braking reaction among the cars immediately ahead of LIN. At the same time, LIN was positioned between cars on either side.”
“During the corner, LIN made contact with LAW. Having reviewed the positioning and movement of the cars involved, the Stewards determined that the contact was primarily the result of the restricted space available to LIN and the chain reaction caused by the incident ahead, rather than any action or error for which LIN could be considered wholly or predominantly to blame.
“The Stewards therefore considered this to be a typical first-corner incident following a restart, with no driver predominantly to blame.”
Motorsport.com ·
内容来自公开信源，聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。