勒克莱尔回应汉密尔顿墨西哥站后要求车队谈话的呼吁
勒克莱尔表示汉密尔顿的驾驶“非常接近极限”，并为自己在墨西哥城大奖赛开赛时的动作进行辩护。
查尔斯·勒克莱尔回应刘易斯·汉密尔顿在墨西哥大奖赛后的车队谈话请求
摩纳哥人认为他和他的队友共同负有责任
对于法拉利车迷来说，这是最新的Scuderia 法拉利 F1新闻，车手更新，技术分析和从马拉内洛及更远地方的赛事反应
查尔斯·勒克莱尔表示刘易斯·汉密尔顿的驾驶“非常接近极限”，同时为自己在墨西哥城大奖赛开赛初段的动作进行辩护。
勒克莱尔在第一圈就向杆位车手汉密尔顿发起了攻击，并在4号弯道成功摆脱了纠缠。
我的意思是，这绝对是一个机会。在1号弯道外侧有一个空隙，我在1号弯道外侧的速度相当快，而2号弯道空间非常有限，这对于赢得比赛当然是预期的。
然后是4号、5号弯道，我和刘易斯都试图非常晚地刹车。我们都没有成功进入弯道。我显然切线了，这最终导致在5号弯道后，马克斯夹在我们中间，这使得情况变得更加复杂。
尽管 stewards（ stewards）后来对勒克莱尔处以5秒罚时，因为他离开赛道并获得了优势，但汉密尔顿也输给了维斯塔潘，维斯塔潘利用这个机会将自己的车提升到第二位。当勒克莱尔在维修区服刑时，维斯塔潘出现在车队的最前方，并最终赢得了比赛。
汉密尔顿事后表示，这次事件让法拉利失去了胜利，并且说“我们肯定得在幕后进行一些严肃的谈话”。
当被问及两人之间是否需要更多的规则时，勒克莱尔表示将会进行一次谈话，但暗示汉密尔顿的挫败感并不一定针对他。
“我们肯定会谈论这件事。我不知道他是否对我所做的事情非常不满，因为我感觉他做的事情也在极限边缘，”他说。
“我认为他可能更多的是对整个情况感到愤怒，关于如何处理四、五次处罚等情况。所以这肯定是我们会谈论的事情。”
勒克莱尔也淡化了这次事件，承认他们两人都犯了一个错误，因为他们为了赛道位置而争斗。
“我们在为胜利而战，所以当然，我和他之间几乎没有余地。最后，我们都犯了一个错误，进入了4号弯，”他说。
“这并不是说我们有什么接触。我们俩都直行，这给了马克斯超车的机会，所以我认为这不应该成为太多讨论的焦点。
“当然很接近，一、二、三非常接近，但我预计我们会争夺领先。四、五，我们都犯了一个错误，我为此付出了代价，受到了处罚。然后你可以争论这是否足够，然后刘易斯在五次中为马克斯付出了代价。”
裁判判定两辆赛车都以过快的速度进入弯道。但他们表示勒克莱尔没有权利要求这个弯道，并且是在赛道外完成的超车。
汉密尔顿在比赛中要求勒克莱尔把位置让回来，但这位摩纳哥车手没有得到法拉利车队的指导来确认这一举动。
“我和车队进行了交谈，并没有得到明确的反馈，我觉得这足以让人困惑，保持位置，我本以为会受到某种处罚，然后我们就付出了代价，”他说。
“我们简要地和车队交谈，试图理解。我问，‘我现在该怎么做？’这总是非常棘手，显然在那个情况下你预期你必须做点什么，但它是第二？第三？第四？嗯，第四可能没有意义，但第二或第三。
“最后我还是坚持了下来。显然，这肯定会在下一次简报中成为讨论的焦点。”
勒克莱尔补充说，他理解为什么会对处罚的大小提出质疑，但他表示规则留给其他选择的余地很小。
“还有规则是写出来的，这也是一个有点困难的事情，就是这种情况，如果你按照规则来，和其他情况并没有那么不同。然而，我确实同意你的观点。有时会有一些场景，你获得的比其他人更多，”他说。
“所以我认为最终我们需要的是不允许我们玩弄那些限制和灰色区域的赛道，因为那样的话，结果会变得有些困难，我相信很多人会以非常糟糕的方式看待它，我理解，但这就是现状。”
问及车手是否在乔治·拉塞尔去年在摩纳哥赛道切弯道后，被警告过类似行为的更严厉处罚，勒克莱尔表示这仅适用于那个赛道。
“在摩纳哥是的，当然是在摩纳哥。我认为这并不是适用于所有赛道的普遍规则，但再次强调，我并不是完全不同意。只是那些规则在某些赛道上，比如今天的赛道，可能会有一些灰色地带，”他说。
“我们知道这一点。我们在周四的车手简报会上和车手们讨论了这个问题。我认为最终的解决方案是拥有一个不允许你这样做赛道的。”
勒克莱尔相信，在比赛前与他的车手们讨论了这个问题后，改变赛道是唯一的真正答案。
“坦白说，我们周四在车手简报会上一直在讨论这个问题，试图弄清楚我们应该如何做出最佳决策。我认为大家的结论可能是，我们首先可能需要改变赛道，确保没有可以冒险的地方或赛道，你可以在内侧采取那么多的风险，”他说。
“如果显然在4号弯出口有一个墙，那么无论是刘易斯还是我都不会把刹车点推得那么远，所以我认为在赛道方面有一些我们可以改进的地方，以便让它变得更简单，否则它非常复杂。”
英文原文
Charles Leclerc responds to Lewis Hamilton's call for Ferrari talks after Mexico GP
The Monegasque believes both he and his team-mate were jointly at fault
For Ferrari fans. The latest Scuderia Ferrari F1 news, driver updates, technical analysis and race reaction from Maranello and beyond.
Charles Leclerc says Lewis Hamilton’s driving was “very much on the limit” as he defended his own move at the beginning of the Mexico City Grand Prix.
Leclerc attacked polesitter Hamilton at Turn 4 on the opening lap and made it out of the scrap ahead of him.
“I mean, it was definitely an opportunity. In Turn 1 there was a gap on the outside and I had quite a lot of speed around the outside of Turn 1, and there was very little space for Turn 2, which is expected for the win obviously,” Leclerc said.
“And then four, five, Lewis and I both tried to brake very late. We both didn’t make the corner. I obviously cut the track, which eventually then after Turn 5 there was Max in between, which made the situation more confusing.”
While the stewards later gave Leclerc a five-second penalty for leaving the track and gaining an advantage, Hamilton also lost out to Verstappen, who used the opportunity to put his car in second. When Leclerc later served the penalty at his pitstop, Verstappen emerged at the front of the pack and eventually won the race.
Hamilton said afterwards that the incident had cost Ferrari the win, and that “we have to have some serious talks behind the scenes for sure”.
Asked whether the pair now needed more rules between them, Leclerc said a conversation would follow, but suggested that Hamilton’s frustrations aren’t necessarily aimed at him.
“We will talk about it obviously. I don’t know if he was very unhappy with what I did, because I felt like it was very much on the limit also what he did,” he said.
“I think he was maybe more angry with the whole situation, how the situation was dealt in four, five with the penalty etc. So this is something we’ll talk about for sure.”
Leclerc also played down the incident, admitting that both had made an error as they fought for track position.
“We are fighting for the win and so of course there’s going to be very little margin left from him and from me. At the end we both did a mistake going into Turn 4,” he said.
“It’s not like we had contact or whatsoever. We both went straight and that gave the opportunity for Max to overtake, so I don’t think it should be that much of a talking point.
“Of course it was close, one, two, three was very close, but I was expecting it to fight for the lead. Four, five, we both made a mistake that I paid with a penalty. Then you can argue whether it’s enough or not, and Lewis then paid out of five with Max.”
The stewards had ruled that both cars had entered the corner with excessive speed. But they said Leclerc was not entitled to claim the corner, and had completed an overtake off the track.
Hamilton had called for Leclerc to hand the place back during the race, but the Monegasque didn’t receive guidance from the Ferrari team to confirm the move.
“Speaking with the team, I didn’t really have a clear feedback, and I think it was just confusing enough to keep the position, and I was expecting some kind of penalty, and then we paid the penalty,” he said.
“We spoke briefly with the team to try and understand. I asked, ‘What should I do now?’ And it’s always very tricky, and obviously in that situation you kind of expect you have to do something, but is it second? Is it third? Is it fourth? Well, fourth probably didn’t make sense, but second or third.
“And at the end I kept going. Obviously it’s going to be a bit of a talking point for sure next briefing.”
Leclerc added that he understood why the size of the penalty was being questioned, but said the rules left little room for anything else.
“There are also rules written, and that’s a bit the difficult thing as well, is that this situation, if you take it by the rule, is not so different to other situations. However, I do agree with you. Sometimes there are scenarios in which you gain more than the other,” he said.
“So I think eventually we just need tracks that doesn’t allow us to play with those kind of limits and grey areas, because then it ends up being a bit of a difficult one, and I’m sure many people will see it in a very bad way, which I understand, but it is the way it is.”
Asked whether drivers had been warned of harsher penalties for similar moves after George Russell cut the chicane in Monaco last year, Leclerc said that had only applied to that circuit.
“In Monaco yes, in Monaco for sure. I don’t think it was a general thing for everywhere, but again, I am not completely disagreeing. It’s just that those rules can have some grey zones on some tracks like today,” he said.
“We knew it. We kind of spoke about it on Thursday with the drivers at the driver briefing. I think that the final solution is to have a track that doesn’t allow you to do that.”
Leclerc believes that changing the circuits is the only real answer, having discussed the issue with his fellow drivers before the race.
“I think, honestly, we’ve been speaking about it all Thursday at the drivers’ briefing, trying to understand in which way should we best take a decision with that. And I think the conclusion of everyone is that we first need probably to change the tracks and make sure that there’s no places or tracks where you can take those amount of risk on the inside,” he said.
“If there was obviously a wall at the exit of Turn 4, neither Lewis or I will have pushed the braking point that much, so I think there’s some things that we can improve track-wise in order to make it more simple, because otherwise it’s very complicated.”
Motorsport.com ·
内容来自公开信源，聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。