马丁·布伦德尔对刘易斯·汉密尔顿新加坡大奖赛策略选择发表评论
刘易斯·汉密尔顿在2026年新加坡大奖赛中获得第六名，对法拉利车队来说是个令人失望的结果。在虚拟安全车阶段，他选择不进站，并在软胎上完成了44圈，最终与队友查尔斯·勒克莱尔失去了可能的领奖台位置。
马丁·布伦德尔对刘易斯·汉密尔顿新加坡大奖赛策略选择发表评论
汉密尔顿选择不进站，在虚拟安全车阶段完成了44圈软胎圈数
对于法拉利车队的粉丝来说，这是最新的Scuderia 法拉利 F1新闻，包括车手更新、技术分析和来自马拉内洛及更远处的比赛反应。
在为天空体育F1撰写关于在滨海湾赛道比赛后的报道时，这位前车手兼评论员讨论了汉密尔顿选择不在虚拟安全车下进站的决定——这一决定似乎让他的比赛走向了负面。
布伦德尔从解说席上看到的
汉密尔顿在第18圈进站更换软胎，这看起来像是两停策略的开端。然后兰斯·斯特罗尔的阿斯顿·马丁赛车在赛道上停下，虚拟安全车出动，法拉利也召回了两辆赛车进站。汉密尔顿没有抓住这个机会，这让他只能以一套软胎完成剩余的44圈比赛。布伦德尔的评价：
“汉密尔顿起步时使用的是一套全新的中胎，但随着比赛的进行开始陷入困境，”他写道。“看起来他采用的是清晰的二停策略，他在第18圈就进站更换软胎。奇怪的是，尽管在兰斯·斯特罗尔的阿斯顿·马丁赛车需要从赛道上移除时有机会进行相对便宜的进站，但他却没有再次进站。”
“哈姆林顿随后在比赛中不断下滑，最终在比赛最后阶段被奥斯卡·皮亚斯蒂的麦凯轮车队超越，失去了第五名的位置，尽管澳大利亚人在比赛中因慢漏气而进行了非计划中的停车。”
“赛后，人们发现切换到一次停站策略，需要他在同一套轮胎上完成44圈，是哈姆林顿自己的决定。”
“他为这个决定向车队道歉。”
“驾驶现代一级方程式赛车并从驾驶舱内管理车队策略是困难的，这次事件就是一个证明。法拉利似乎原本期望哈姆林顿在虚拟安全车期间进站。”
法拉利车队负责人弗雷德·瓦瑟尔在维修区也说了类似的话。他告诉记者们，'我们因为这次决策失去了领奖台，'并声称如果哈密尔顿当时停车，他可能会获得第二或第三名。关于被忽视的指令，瓦瑟尔说：'当我们要求他们进站时，刘易斯想留在赛道上。'
查尔斯·勒克莱尔，法拉利，刘易斯·汉密尔顿，法拉利
值得赞扬的是，哈密尔顿没有回避事实，正是他的决定毁了他的比赛。他在赛后通过无线电道歉：'对不起，伙计们。我因为那个策略让你们失望了。'他在感到不适并被国际汽联医疗团队检查后，被允许离开媒体区。周一，他在社交媒体上发布了一份声明：
'昨天没有达到我们预期的结果，这完全是我的责任。在一个难以超车的赛道上，你需要尝试不同的方法，而我选择了一种最终没有成功的策略。这是一次痛苦的教训，但我对所做的决定承担全部责任。
赛车涉及到的决策并不总是能带来预期的结果。关键在于在错误发生时能够认识到它们，并利用它们作为改进的基础。我非常感激车队在每个周末所付出的努力。P6并不能反映出我们在这周末车上的速度，尽管结果不尽如人意，但仍有积极的一面可以吸取。
非常感谢新加坡的粉丝们带来的能量。我将继续努力，并在下一场比赛中战斗归来。
汉密尔顿冒险背后的直觉是可以理解的。新加坡是一个很难超车的赛道，因为在这里，被交通困住的车手会尝试几乎任何方法来突破。但是，在VSC下进行免费停站对任何车手来说都是难以拒绝的，这也是为什么布伦达对此如此困惑。
汉密尔顿拥有七个世界冠军头衔和相应的直觉，但现代F1将车手在驾驶舱中无法获得的资料交给了维修区。一个围绕VSC停站做出决策的车队需要其车手信任它，而法拉利需要从其最著名的车手中获得更多的这种信任，而不仅仅是在新加坡。
英文原文
Martin Brundle reacts to "bizarre" Lewis Hamilton Singapore GP strategy choice
Hamilton chose not to pit under the virtual safety car and completed 44 laps on soft tyres
For Ferrari fans. The latest Scuderia Ferrari F1 news, driver updates, technical analysis and race reaction from Maranello and beyond.
Lewis Hamilton's sixth place finish at the 2026 Singapore Grand Prix was disappointing for the Ferrari team. After the driver chose not to pit when he was called in, he struggled with tyres towards the end of the race and lost a potential podium finish alongside his team-mate Charles Leclerc. Martin Brundle has now given his verdict on what he called a "bizarre" strategy.
Writing for Sky Sports F1 following the race at Marina Bay, the former driver-turned-pundit discussed Hamilton's choice of not pitting under the virtual safety car - the moment his race seemed to take a negative turn.
What Brundle saw from the commentary box
Hamilton came in on lap 18 for softs, which looked like the opening move of a two-stop race. Then Lance Stroll's Aston Martin stopped on track, the VSC came out, and Ferrari called both its cars to the pits. Hamilton chose not to take the opportunity, which left him with a 44-lap run to the flag on a single set of softs. Brundle's verdict:
"Hamilton started on a fresh set of medium tyres but began to struggle as the race progressed," he wrote. "Appearing to be on a clear two-stop strategy, he pitted as early as Lap 18 for soft tyres. Bizarrely, he would not stop again, despite the opportunity to make a relatively cheap pitstop under a Virtual Safety Car [VSC] when Lance Stroll’s stricken Aston Martin had to be cleared from the circuit.
"Hamilton then endured a relentless slide down the order, eventually losing fifth place to Oscar Piastri’s McLaren in the closing stages, despite the Australian having made an unscheduled stop for a slow puncture.
"After the race, it emerged that switching to a one-stop strategy, which required him to complete 44 laps on the same tyres, had been Hamilton’s own decision.
"He apologised to the team for the call.
"It is difficult to run a modern F1 car and manage the team’s strategy from behind the wheel, and the incident was telling. Ferrari had seemingly expected Hamilton to pit under the VSC."
Ferrari team principal Fred Vasseur has said much the same thing from the pitwall. He told reporters, "We lost the podium with this," and claimed Hamilton would likely have finished second or third had he stopped. On the disobeyed instruction, Vasseur said: "When we asked them to pit, Lewis wanted to stay on track."
Charles Leclerc, Ferrari, Lewis Hamilton Ferrari
To his credit, Hamilton didn't hide from the fact it was his decision that ruined his race. He apologised over the radio after the flag: "Sorry, boys. I let you down today with that strategy." He was excused from the media pen after feeling unwell and being checked by the FIA medical team. On Monday he posted a statement on social media:
"Yesterday wasn't the result we were looking for, and that's on me. At a track that's difficult to overtake, you need to try something different and I chose a strategy that ultimately didn't deliver. It's a painful lesson to learn, but I take full responsibility for the decisions I made.
"Racing involves decisions that don't always yield the desired outcome. The key is recognising mistakes when they happen and using them as a foundation for improvement. I'm grateful to the team for the work they put in every weekend. P6 doesn't reflect the pace we had in the car over the weekend, and despite the result there are positives to take away.
"Massive thanks to the fans in Singapore for the energy. I'll continue to put the work in and come back fighting at the next race."
The instinct behind Hamilton's gamble is understandable. Singapore is a nightmare to pass on, with it being a track where a driver stuck in traffic will try almost anything to break out of it. But a free stop under a VSC would be difficult for any driver to pass up, hence why Brundle was so confused about it.
Hamilton has seven world titles and the instincts to match, but modern F1 hands the pitwall the data a driver in the cockpit simply doesn't have. A team that has built its call around a VSC stop needs its driver to trust it, and Ferrari needs a lot more of that trust from its most famous driver than it got in Singapore.
Motorsport.com ·
内容来自公开信源，聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。