FIA就科拉平托荷兰大奖赛处罚引发的网络辱骂探讨法律选项
国际汽联谴责针对F1赛事干事的网络骚扰，此前干事在赞德福特对阿尔派车手弗兰科·科拉平托和小红牛车手阿维德·林德布拉德处以双黄旗下超车的通过维修区处罚，FIA表示正在探讨法律选项。
国际汽联正在探索法律途径，以应对弗朗哥·科拉平托在荷兰大奖赛受罚后针对F1赛事干事进行的辱骂行为
在科拉平托在荷兰大奖赛中收到有争议的处罚后，F1管理机构FIA和阿尔派车队都成为了网络恶毒言论的目标
F1管理机构FIA谴责了针对其F1赛事干事的网络骚扰，因为干事们依照规则手册对阿尔派车手弗朗哥·科拉平托在赞德福特作出处罚。
科拉平托和小红牛车手阿尔维德·林德布拉德都因在比赛第1圈双黄旗下超车而被处以穿越维修区处罚。在该圈结束时，由于红牛车手马克斯·维斯塔潘发生严重撞车，赛会出示了黄旗，导致该圈最后一个赛段一直处于黄旗状态直到发车直道。第2圈的前半段重新恢复绿旗，随后赛会控制中心决定出示红旗。
当黄旗出现时，科拉平托（Colapinto）在赞德沃特的最后一个弯道出弯时完成了对红牛二队（小红牛）车手角田裕毅的超越，而林德布拉德（Lindblad）则在冲过起终点线之前滑流超越了阿尔派车手加斯利，此前两位车手都因赛道上的碎片被迫采取了避让动作。
针对科拉平托的事件，国际汽联干事写道：“43号车在进入14号弯时位于22号车后方，并在第1圈结束前的双黄旗区域、于终点线之前超越了22号车。通常，此类违规行为需要处以10秒停车再出发的处罚，但干事们认识到此时赛道上大量碎片所造成的复杂情况，并将其作为减轻处罚的情节予以考虑。”
干事们还以完全相同的措辞对林德布拉德做出了裁决。
科拉平托认为他的处罚“极其严厉”，因为他在黄旗出现的瞬间之后才超越了角田裕毅。然而，根据规则手册的字面规定，两位车手的处罚都是明确无疑的，因为管理机构对涉及安全的违规行为尤为严肃对待。
Colapinto的阿根廷赞助商Mercado Libre在社交媒体上走得更远，质疑了FIA赛事干事的诚信。“赛事干事正在摧毁F1的诚信。这个赛季他们的表现糟糕透顶，并且正在影响比赛结果，”Mercado Libre的首席营销官Sean Summers说道，“是无能？是不诚实？还是两者皆有？那个组织的文化里肯定有什么东西严重坏掉了。”
这位赞助商的煽动性言论（现已被删除）进一步在社交媒体上火上浇油，FIA赛事干事收到了辱骂性威胁，而阿尔派车队自己的社交账号也成为攻击目标，因为一部分声音很大的阿根廷车迷认为车队在这件事上没有足够力挺Colapinto。
周一，阿尔派车队声明：“在规则的执行以及正赛过程中体育处罚的适用方面，我们完全信任FIA和赛事干事。”
“我们认为，针对荷兰大奖赛开局阶段黄旗违规所施加的处罚确实严厉，但我们承认按照法规条文的字面规定，这些处罚是恰当的，并且在所有车手中适用标准一致，这是我们作为一支车队可以回顾并从中学习的事情。”
据悉，为打击体育领域的网络滥用而发起“联合抵制网络滥用”（United Against Online Abuse）运动的国际汽联（FIA）正在探索法律途径，并发布了以下声明。
"荷兰大奖赛之后，国际汽联赛事干事在依据国际汽联规则作出体育处罚后，成为了网络滥用的攻击目标。
"‘联合抵制网络滥用’联盟谴责一切形式的辱骂和骚扰。对判罚有不同意见是体育的一部分，但这绝不能成为威胁或人身攻击的理由。
"2023年，在一名赛事干事在美国大奖赛后遭到针对性攻击后，国际汽联发起了‘联合抵制网络滥用’联盟。我们敦促所有参与这项运动的人，无论在线上还是线下，都以尊重和负责任的态度行事。
在对国际汽联（FIA）的恶毒谩骂中，有人暗示科拉平托（Colapinto）受到处罚是因为他的国籍，认为其中存在对非英国籍车手的偏见。
林德布拉德（Lindblad）因非常相似的违规行为受到了完全相同的处罚，而他是英国人。
英文原文
FIA exploring legal options over abuse against F1 stewards following Franco Colapinto's Dutch GP penalty
Both Formula 1's governing body the FIA and the Alpine team have been the target of online vitriol following Colapinto's contested penalty in the Dutch Grand Prix
Formula 1's governing body the FIA condemned the online harassment directed at its F1 race stewards following their decision to apply the rulebook and penalise Alpine driver Franco Colapinto at Zandvoort.
Colapinto, and Racing Bulls driver Arvid Lindblad, were both handed drive-through penalties for overtaking under a double-waved yellow flag on lap 1 of the race. At the end of the lap, the yellows came out for a big crash involving Red Bull's Max Verstappen, which neutralised the final marshal sector of the lap until the start-finish straight. The first half of lap 2 was green again until race control decided to throw a red flag.
As the yellows came out, Colapinto completed an overtake on Racing Bulls driver Yuki Tsunoda coming out of Zandvoort's final corner, while Lindblad drafted past Alpine's Pierre Gasly before crossing the start/finish line, after both drivers had been forced to take evasive action for debris.
Referring to the Colapinto incident, the FIA stewards wrote: "Car 43 was behind Car 22 entering Turn 14 and overtook Car 22 in the double yellow flag sector before the line at the end of Lap 1. Normally, such infringement requires a 10-second stop/go penalty, but the Stewards acknowledge the complications caused by the significant amount of debris on track at this point and take this into account as mitigating circumstances."
The stewards also offered an identically phrased verdict for Lindblad.
Colapinto felt his penalty was "extremely harsh" as he overtook Tsunoda a split second after the yellows came out. However, according to the letter of the rulebook both drivers' penalties were clear-cut cases as the governing body takes safety related infractions particularly seriously.
Colapinto's Argentinian sponsor Mercado Libre went much further on social media, questioning the FIA stewards' integrity. "The Stewards are killing the integrity of F1. This season they are proving to be horrible and impacting race results," said Sean Summers, Mercado Libre's chief marketing officer. "Incompetence? Dishonesty? Both? Something is seriously broken in that organisation's culture."
The sponsor's inflammatory comments, which have since been taken down. further stoked the flames on social media as the FIA stewards received abusive threats, while Alpine's own social accounts were also targeted because a vocal subset of Argentinian fans felt the team did not back Colapinto enough in the case.
On Monday, Alpine stated: "We fully trust the FIA and the stewards when it comes to the policing of these rules and the application of sporting penalties during a live race scenario.
"We believe the penalties applied for yellow flag Infringements during the opening laps of the Dutch Grand Prix were indeed harsh, but acknowledge they fit the punishment based on the letter of the law and were consistently applied across all competitors and is something we can review and learn from as a team."
The FIA, which established the United Against Online Abuse campaign to tackle online abuse in sport, is understood to be exploring legal options and has released the following statement.
"Following the Dutch Grand Prix, FIA stewards were targeted with online abuse after applying sporting penalties in line with FIA regulations.
"The United Against Online Abuse Coalition condemns all forms of abuse and harassment. Disagreement with decisions is part of sport, but it must never justify threats or personal attacks.
"In 2023, the FIA launched the United Against Online Abuse Coalition after a steward faced targeted abuse following the United States Grand Prix. We urge everyone engaging with our sport to do so with respect and responsibility, online and offline."
Among the toxic abuse hurled at the FIA, it was suggested Colapinto was penalised because of his nationality, with there being perceived bias against non-British drivers.
Lindblad, who was given an identical penalty for a very similar infraction, is British.
Motorsport.com ·
内容来自公开信源，聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。