汉密尔顿新加坡大奖赛策略失误点评
法拉利承认汉密尔顿因策略失误在新加坡大奖赛中失去领奖台，他最终排名第六。汉密尔顿对自己的策略选择承担全部责任，但法拉利是否应该做更多来挽救他的比赛？
法拉利承认汉密尔顿在新加坡大奖赛中因策略失误失去了领奖台，他最终排名第六。
汉密尔顿对自己的策略选择承担全部责任，但法拉利是否应该做更多来挽救他的比赛，是否能够更好地管理他和队友查尔斯·勒克莱尔？
这里是我们团队的观点...
法拉利（可能）本就注定要输掉这场比赛。
法拉利理所当然地对汉密尔顿的策略成为赛后讨论的焦点感到愤怒，因为内部显然是汉密尔顿的错误，而不是团队的问题。
但这就是当关键信息——即汉密尔顿被告知进站但没有这么做！——因为奇特的法拉利-汉密尔顿无线电死区而没有出现在直播中时会发生的事情。
无论如何，这不是法拉利赢得的比赛，也没有将自己置于最佳获胜位置。我怀疑他们无论如何也没有这样的赛车。
所以，我们真的不应该从相当令人失望的马克斯·维斯塔潘/小红牛的表现中拿走任何东西。汉密尔顿本可以站在杆位。查尔斯·勒克莱尔本可以领先进入第一个弯道。法拉利本可以更好地管理分策略。这些都没有发生！
即使如此，维斯塔潘卓越的轮胎管理——他在第一段练习结束时的速度远远超过任何人在旧轮胎上所能做到的——可能仍然会获胜。
赛道位置是一个需要克服的大障碍，但维斯塔潘和小红牛做到了一切，确保无论其他人是否全力以赴，这都不是问题。
法拉利似乎在任何机会下都能自己给自己添乱。
我实在不明白法拉利在新加坡想要达到什么目标，即使汉密尔顿在推动它。比赛开始时有两种轮胎选择，软胎可以更好地起跑，而中胎可以用于超车，那么为什么当汉密尔顿使用中胎时，他却是最先进维修区的车手？
如果你有两辆赛车，它们的性能水平差不多，而你采取了不同的策略来启动它们，那么车手和车队都需要明白，即使是犹豫一秒钟，也可能迅速让所有的努力付诸东流。
如果一个车手确实比另一个车手快，那么他需要立即做出反应并让对方超越；在队友后面跑超过一圈只会消耗你的轮胎。所以最终，两辆赛车都会受到整体比赛时间的负面影响。
比赛早期，车手和车队需要让不同的策略发挥作用，不要阻碍车手取得尽可能好的成绩，但如果是在接近终点旗的时候，比如说比赛最后10%，那么除了平衡被其他车队车辆追上和超越的风险之外，你应该坚持你的位置。
正如我们在两辆麦凯轮车手之间的冲刺赛中看到的那样，对于车队来说，哪个车手最终排名第四或第五并不重要，但对于其中一位车手来说，贪婪占据了上风。
最后一圈了，奥斯卡·皮亚斯蒂基本上被勒克莱尔夹在中间，因为勒克莱尔轮胎出现问题而行驶缓慢，所以兰多·诺里斯也应该考虑到这一点。别提事故了，在车队积分上的损失可能会让迈凯轮损失1000万美元的奖金。
这关乎驾驶员之间的尊重，当你向车队报告你的速度时要有诚实，车队也必须足够大胆，毫不犹豫地做出那些有时困难的决策。
汉密尔顿和法拉利真的步调一致吗？
我对无线电广播的缺失表示同情，这使得事情看起来比实际情况更糟。而且，汉密尔顿在赛后通过车队无线电立即道歉，这很得体。
但这对我在汉密尔顿对法拉利的当前信心上仍留下了一些关键问题。
为什么汉密尔顿在被告知要进站时没有在虚拟安全车下进站？从车内视角来看，他显然没有试图进入维修区——这只能有两个原因。
要么是他简单地忘记了，要么是他否决了法拉利的决定。
如果是后者，这确实引发了关于汉密尔顿是否对法拉利策略师有100%的信任和信心的问题。说实话——谁又能责怪他呢？
我们看到了他的前任，卡洛斯·塞恩斯，在许多场合都做了同样的事情，基本上是从驾驶舱中制定策略。
这可能会造成问题——比如对比赛的完全误判，因为你没有完整的画面——但这是因为被放在错误的位置太多次的后果。
感觉像是从之前的错误中产生的误解可能今天烧毁了法拉利。
英文原文
Ferrari admits Lewis Hamilton lost a podium at Formula 1's Singapore Grand Prix due to a strategy failure which saw him slip back to sixth place.
Hamilton took "full responsibility" for his strategy calls, but should Ferrari have done more to save his race, could it have managed him and team-mate Charles Leclerc better?
Here's what our team thinks...
A race Ferrari (probably) was always going to lose
Ferrari's understandably peeved that Hamilton's strategy became such a big post-race talking point when it seemed internally clear the error was his, not the team's.
But that's what happens when a key bit of information - namely, Hamilton being told to pit but not doing so! - doesn't make it onto the broadcast because of a weird Ferrari-Hamilton radio dead spot.
Regardless, this wasn't a race Ferrari won, or put itself in the best position to win. And I suspect it didn't have the car to anyway.
So really let's not take anything away from a pretty crushing Max Verstappen/Red Bull performance. Hamilton could have been on pole. Charles Leclerc could have led into the first corner. Ferrari could have managed the split-strategy better. None of that happened!
And even if it did, Verstappen's superior tyre management - his pace at the end of the first stint was so far beyond what anyone else could do on old rubber - probably would have won out anyway.
Track position would have been a big hurdle to overcome, but Verstappen and Red Bull did everything right to make sure that was a non-issue regardless of whether others put their best foot forward or not.
Ferrari seems to be able to shoot itself in the foot at any opportunity.
I just don’t understand what Ferrari was trying to achieve in Singapore, even if Hamilton was pushing for it. There was a two-tyre choice to start the race, softs to potentially get off the start line better and mediums to then go long for the overcut, so why, when Hamilton was on mediums, was he the first driver to pit?
If you have two cars and they are more or less at the same performance level and you start them on different strategies, then both the drivers and the team need to understand that indecision, even just for a lap, can put all that effort down the pan very quickly.
If one driver is genuinely faster than the other, then it needs to react and be let past immediately; running behind your team-mate for more than one lap just eats up your tyres. So in the end both cars suffer overall race time.
Early in the race, the drivers and the team need to let the different strategies play out and not stand in the way of a driver getting the best result they can, but if it’s on the run down to the chequered flag, say the last 10% of the race, then other than balancing out the risk of being caught and overtaken by another team's car, you should stick to your positions.
As we saw in the sprint race between the two McLaren drivers, it didn’t really matter to the team which driver was to finish fourth or fifth, but for one of its drivers, greed took over.
It was the last lap, and Oscar Piastri was basically boxed in with Leclerc running slowly with tyre problems, so Lando Norris should have also taken that into account. Never mind the accident, that loss of points in the constructors' could cost McLaren $10million in prize money.
It’s all about respect between drivers, honesty when you're reporting your pace to the team and the team being bold enough to make those sometimes difficult decisions without hesitation.
Are Hamilton and Ferrari really in sync?
I have sympathy for the lack of radio being broadcast, making things look worse than they were. And Hamilton's immediate post-race apology over the team radio was classy.
But it still leaves some key questions for me about Hamilton's current confidence in Ferrari.
Why did Hamilton not pit under the virtual safety car when told to do so? Looking at the onboard, he clearly made no attempt to enter the pits - and that can only be for two reasons.
Either he simply forgot, or he overruled Ferrari.
If it's the latter, that does raise questions about whether Hamilton has 100% faith and trust in Ferrari's strategists. And to be honest - who could blame him?
We saw his predecessor, Carlos Sainz, doing the same on a number of occasions, essentially dictating the strategy from the cockpit.
That will cause problems - like a total misreading of the race because you don't have a full picture - but it's a consequence of being put in the wrong position too many times.
It feels like mistrust from those previous mistakes might have burned Ferrari today.
The Race ·
内容来自公开信源，聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。