← 返回资讯流

F1 中英提炼 · 公开详情

  1. 赛事新闻

    诺里斯0.011秒险胜夺西班牙大奖赛杆位,斯特拉盛赞

    诺里斯在西班牙大奖赛排位赛中以0.011秒的微弱优势击败安东内利夺得杆位,迈凯伦领队Andrea Stella对他的表现给予高度赞扬。

    兰多·诺里斯(诺里斯)在夺得马德里F1惊人杆位的路上“损失了三个十分之一秒”

    迈凯伦车队领队解释了他的车手如何在最后阶段出现明显失误的情况下,仍然从梅赛德斯手中抢下杆位

    在西班牙大奖赛上,兰多·诺里斯(诺里斯)仅以0.011秒的优势从基米·安东内利(安东内利)手中抢下杆位之后,迈凯伦车队领队安德里亚·斯特拉(Andrea Stella)既欣喜若狂,又对他的车手大加赞扬。

    整个周末,这台木瓜色赛车从未真正看起来快到足以参与争夺荣誉的行列。梅赛德斯在所有练习赛中都压过法拉利位居第一;在Q1和Q2中,银箭车队都在与红牛争夺头名位置。但迈凯伦始终落后零点几秒。

    然后是那圈Q3。诺里斯在第一次尝试后仅排第六,比领跑者刘易斯·汉密尔顿慢了0.446秒,但他在第二次尝试中提高了0.701秒——刚好足以超越看起来无可撼动的安东内利。

    但他并没有预料到这一点——尤其是在最后一个弯角犯了错之后,他的车尾有一点点失去抓地力。“抱歉,我搞砸了,伙计,”诺里斯对比赛工程师威尔·约瑟夫说。后者让他等所有赛车跑完,暗示他有机会拿到杆位,诺里斯回了一句:“该死的白痴。”

    “那不是你最棒的最后一个弯角,但仍然是杆位,所以干得好,”约瑟夫说。诺里斯花了好一会儿才真正相信自己没有被捉弄。

    “到最后一个弯角时,我就是有点,我不知道,一个小失误,”这位英国车手继续解释道。“我想我在车里有点兴奋过头了,入弯推得太狠,说实话,我以为自己要撞墙了。所以,是的,还好到1号弯是一段短直道。”

    “但这一圈真的非常完美,出弯很好,路肩利用得很好,把在这里非常重要的各种小细节都处理对了。而且我只在最后一圈做到了这一点,一切都成功了。”

    斯特拉形容这一圈是“他见过的最令人印象深刻的圈速之一,作为一个观看了450场大奖赛遥测数据的人”。

    作为对比,奥斯卡·皮亚斯特里(皮亚斯特里)排位仅列第七,比队友慢了0.470秒。

    “说实话,我们的表现并不具备拿下杆位的水平,”斯特拉继续说道。“整个周末的任何一个阶段,我们都没有展示出这辆车的性能达到了最佳赛车的水平。我们在第一计时段、低速弯和路肩方面明显欠缺,对车手来说这是一辆很难跑出完美一圈的车。我们看到它有潜力爆发的时候,但要把它全部组合在一起总是非常困难。”

    “最令人印象深刻的是,尽管在最后一个四分之一段损失了三分半秒,仍然拿下了杆位,这意味着如果没有这个问题,这本来会是一个相当有说服力的杆位。

    “与此同时,这个问题是达到Lando所达到那种极限水平的后果。但今天每个人都会去逼近极限。

    “让这一圈独一无二的,尤其是当你看遥测数据时,是精度:刹车、入弯时携带的速度、压路肩的方式、上油门的时机。一切都以相当独特的精度水准执行。

    “对我而言,如果要我说出与这一圈相关的主要特质,那就是:每一米的执行都有着令人难以置信的精度。”

    正如之前提到的,据Stella表示,Norris的驾驶失误与他在该圈剩余部分中拼得有多狠直接相关。

    “他只是为这一事实付出了代价——那一圈比其他任何一圈都快了大约一秒,因此轮胎被压榨得多得多,”这位意大利人补充道。“我的意思是,轮胎已经疲劳了,而Lando不知怎么没有把这一点考虑进去,他带着与其他一些弯角相同的冲劲进入了那个弯。”

    “他在入弯时转向过度,这意味着他完全偏离了赛车线,正如我所说,他损失了超过三十分之三秒。这不是什么刻意计算的结果;如果说有什么问题,那就是他没有充分考虑到轮胎已经疲劳了。”

    “我不认为他知道自己会陷入麻烦。我觉得他只是处于进攻模式,但这对于轮胎所剩的性能来说有点过头了。”

    英文原文

    Lando Norris lost “three tenths” on way to shock Madring F1 pole

    McLaren team boss explains how his driver snatched pole away from Mercedes despite a glaring error late on

    After Lando Norris snatched pole position away from Kimi Antonelli by a mere 0.011s at the Spanish Grand Prix, McLaren team principal Andrea Stella was both ecstatic and panegyrical towards his driver.

    At no point during the weekend had the papaya cars actually looked quick enough to be in the mix for glory. Mercedes had topped all practice sessions from Ferrari; in Q1 and in Q2, the Silver Arrows were fighting Red Bull for the top spot. But McLaren was always a couple of tenths in arrears.

    Then there was that Q3 lap. Norris was just sixth after his first attempt, 0.446s down on pacesetter Lewis Hamilton, but improved by 0.701s on his second attempt – just enough to edge ahead of a seemingly untouchable Antonelli.

    But he didn’t expect it – especially after making a mistake in the final corner, having ever so slightly lost the rear end. “Sorry, I fucked up man,” Norris told race engineer Will Joseph. The latter told him to wait for all cars to finish, implying he had a shot at pole, to which Norris retorted: “Fucking idiot.”

    “It wasn’t your best final corner, but it’s still pole, so well done,” Joseph said. It took a while for Norris to actually believe he was not being pranked.

    “By the last corner, I just had a bit of a, I don’t know, a little moment,” the British driver went on to explain. “I think I got a bit excited in the car and I just overpushed the entry and, honestly, I thought I was in the wall. So, yeah, luckily a short run to Turn 1.

    “But the lap really was just perfect, from good exits, good kerbs, just getting all the little things that are very important around here correct. And I did that only on my last lap and it all worked out.”

    That lap was described by Stella as “one of the most impressive laps that [he] has witnessed, as somebody that watches telemetry in 450 grands prix”.

    As a point of comparison, Oscar Piastri qualified down in seventh, 0.470s adrift of his team-mate.

    “We were not honestly performing to the level of scoring a pole position,” Stella continued. “At no stage during the weekend we demonstrated that the car was performing at the level of being the best car. We were lacking quite significantly in the first sector, low-speed [corners] and kerbing, and for the drivers it was a very difficult car to nail a lap. We saw that there were spells of potential, but it's always very difficult to put it together.

    “The most impressive thing is the fact that it's a pole position despite having lost three-and-a-half tenths in the last quarter, which means that it would have been a pretty convincing pole position without this issue.

    “At the same time, this issue is a consequence of pushing to the level that Lando managed to push. But today everyone will have pushed the limits.

    “The thing that makes the lap unique, when you look especially at the telemetry, is the precision, the braking, the speed you carry in entry, the striking of the kerb, the going on power. Everything is executed with a pretty unique level of precision.

    “For me, that's if anything the main attribute that I would associate to this lap: just incredible precision in the metre-by-metre execution.”

    According to Stella, as previously mentioned, Norris’ driving error was directly related to how hard he pushed in the remainder of the lap.

    “He just paid the price of the fact that the lap was coming, like, one second faster than any other lap, therefore there was quite a lot more that was extracted from the tyres,” the Italian added. “I mean, the tyres were tired and somehow Lando did not take this into account and he entered the corner with the same impetus that he had in some other corners.

    “He oversteered in entry, and this means that he loses completely the racing line, and like I said, he lost more than three tenths. It's nothing calculated; if anything, he's not taking enough into account that the tyres were tired.

    “I don't think he knew [he was going to be in trouble]. I think he just was in attacking mode, but it was a bit too much for what the tyres had left.”

    Motorsport.com ·

    查看原文 →

    内容来自公开信源,聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。

公开资讯页面,通过同源公开 API 读取已发布内容。