“公平与诚信”面临考验，FIA将就摩纳哥争议做出裁决
迈凯伦领队安德烈亚·斯特拉表示，车队就摩纳哥大奖赛成绩提出上诉是出于对“运动诚信”的担忧。周二国际汽联国际上诉法院将审理迈凯伦与红牛对6月摩纳哥大奖赛成绩的上诉。
“公平与诚信”——随着国际汽联即将就摩纳哥争议作出裁决，F1的这些价值观正面临考验
F1正在等待迈凯伦和红牛就摩纳哥大奖赛结果发起的上诉程序的裁决结果
迈凯伦F1车队领队安德烈亚·斯特拉表示，车队对摩纳哥大奖赛结果提出的上诉（将于周二举行），源于对“这项运动诚信”的担忧。
周二，国际汽联国际上诉法院正在审理迈凯伦和红牛针对六月份摩纳哥大奖赛结果提出的上诉。在那场比赛中，多名车手因超出维修区限速而被处以时间处罚，其中包括迈凯伦的奥斯卡·皮亚斯特里（皮亚斯特里）和阿尔派车手皮埃尔·加斯利（加斯利）。
事后查明，那些进站通道违规信号是误报，起因是摩纳哥独特的进站入口起点处计时线圈出错。除以及他的阿尔派队友科拉平托之外，所有车手都已在比赛中服完了时间处罚，而这位法国车手则在终点线被处以双重五秒加时处罚，使他从第三名降至第七名。
在阿尔派对Gasly的处罚提出复审申请后，干事们撤销了两项处罚，并恢复了这位法国车手的领奖台位置，这使红牛队的哈贾尔降至第四名，同时也将迈凯伦的Piastri的排名往后挤了。
结果，迈凯伦和红牛双双启动了上诉程序，因为他们对Gasly的处罚被撤销一事有异议，而包括Piastri在内的其他车手却没有这样的机会。
在听证会召开之前——听证会将于周二进行，但可能会拖得更久——迈凯伦老板Stella表示，车队既是在维护自身在车队积分榜上的利益，也是在维护这项赛事整体的利益。
安德烈亚·斯特拉表示"这项运动的公正性"正处于危险之中
"我们将带着双重目的出席国际上诉法院的听证会," 斯特拉在周日荷兰大奖赛后说道。"第一个目的比迈凯伦的利益更为宽泛。我们认为摩纳哥大奖赛之后所发生的程序需要被重新审视, 因为从对所有参赛者的公平性来看, 处罚被撤销这一事实引入了一些令人严重担忧的因素。我们希望借助国际上诉法院的机会, 对这一方面作出澄清。
"显然, 这个案件还有更多关联之处。它可以涉及维修区限速器速度如何计算等技术层面的问题。但对我而言, 从更高的层面来看, 更需要澄清的其实是公平性和原则, 并有可能将其重新确立。"
他补充道: "第二个方面是我们迈凯伦自身的利益。我们实际上也因执行了一次不可上诉的处罚而受到了损害。这让我们在锦标赛中损失了积分。
"因此，这不仅关系到一级方程式和这项运动诚信的普遍利益，也关系到迈凯伦在锦标赛成绩方面的实质利益。这是两个出发点、两种视角，我们希望在国际上诉法院即将进行的审理中就此寻求澄清。"
英文原文
“Fairness and integrity” of F1 at stake as FIA set to rule on Monaco controversy
Formula 1 is awaiting the outcome of the appeal procedure McLaren and Red Bull initiated against the result of the Monaco Grand Prix
McLaren Formula 1 team principal Andrea Stella says its appeal against the Monaco Grand Prix result, which is being held on Tuesday, stems from its concern for "the integrity of the sport".
On Tuesday, the FIA's International Court of Appeal is handling an appeal by McLaren and Red Bull against the result of June's Monaco Grand Prix, in which several drivers were handed time penalties for exceeding pitlane speed limits, including McLaren's Oscar Piastri and Alpine driver Pierre Gasly.
Afterwards, it emerged those pitlane infractions were false flags, caused by a timing loop error at the start of Monaco's unique pit entry. All drivers, other than Gasly (and his Alpine team-mate Franco Colapinto), had already served their time penalties during the race, while the Frenchman was handed a double five-second time penalty at the flag, demoting him from third to seventh.
After Alpine launched a Right of Review against Gasly's penalties, the stewards rescinded both and restored the Frenchman's podium berth, which demoted Red Bull's Isack Hadjar to fourth and also bumped McLaren's Piastri down the order.
As a result, both McLaren and Red Bull launched an appeal procedure, because they took issue with Gasly's penalty being rescinded while other drivers, including Piastri, had no such opportunity.
Anticipating the hearing, which takes place across Tuesday but could potentially drag on for longer, McLaren boss Stella said the team was both looking after its own interest in the constructors' standings and the interest of the series in general.
Andrea Stella says the "integrity of the sport" is at stake
"We go to the hearing at the International Court of Appeal with a double intent," Stella said on Sunday after the Dutch Grand Prix. "The first intent is more general than the interest of McLaren. We think that the process that happened after the race in Monaco needs to be reviewed because from fairness for all competitors, the fact that the penalty was removed introduces some significant elements of concern. And we would like to take the opportunity of the International Court of Appeal for a clarification of this aspect.
"There's obviously more related to this case. It can go into the technical aspects of how the pit limiter speed was calculated. But for me, at a high level, it's more the fairness and the principle that needs to be clarified and possibly reinstated."
He added: "The second aspect is the interest of McLaren ourselves. We were also materially penalised for having served a penalty that is not appealable. And this cost us points in the championship.
"So, there's a general interest for Formula 1 and the integrity of the sport. And there's a material interest for McLaren in terms of our championship impact. These are the two points of view, the two perspectives that we would like to pursue and seek clarification for in the coming International Court of Appeal."
Motorsport.com ·
内容来自公开信源，聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。