← 返回资讯流

F1 中英提炼 · 公开详情

  1. 赛事新闻

    汉密尔顿新加坡大奖赛意外崩溃原因

    汉密尔顿在新加坡大奖赛中因未在虚拟安全车阶段进站而失误,导致赛车崩溃。他在比赛中从第三位跌至第六位,而队友勒克莱尔和安东内利则趁机在短暂的安全车阶段进站。

    汉密尔顿在新加坡大奖赛中因未在虚拟安全车阶段进站而失误,导致赛车崩溃。

    汉密尔顿在新加坡大奖赛的前半段跑在队友查尔斯·勒克莱尔之后,位列第三,但他的赌注——坚持使用旧款软胎跑完全程——最终失败了。

    勒克莱尔和基米·安东内利利用兰斯·斯特罗尔的阿斯顿·马丁赛车故障引发的短暂安全车阶段的机会进行了便宜的进站。

    如果汉密尔顿也这样做,他可能会在几圈前进站并利用提前进站策略超越兰多·诺里斯。

    由于他没有这样做,车队无线电中只有勒克莱尔被指示进站的指令,这似乎表明法拉利在VSC期间不可思议地将汉密尔顿排除在外。

    鉴于汉密尔顿在第一段比赛中使用了更硬的轮胎组合,而在其他两位车手进站更换中胎后,他仍然使用软胎,这似乎尤为奇怪。

    这意味着他只能进行一次进站,这将导致第二段比赛时间过长,这是不切实际的。

    但这却是由于一个不寻常的故障导致的误导性后果,该故障阻止了法拉利在VSC期间以及之后与汉密尔顿的无线电通讯被听到。

    他的车载摄像头和音频在VSC开始后不久就出现了明显的扭曲。法拉利坚称,汉密尔顿在16号弯时被指示——与勒克莱尔同时——但他没有这么做。

    在VSC期间结束后的一段时间内,没有收到来自或发给汉密尔顿的无线电信息。这通常伴随着一条消息,告知VSC即将结束,以确保车手准备好重新开始比赛——因此,这与某种奇怪的事情发生,阻止了汉密尔顿的无线电信号被捕捉(这有时会发生)的观点是一致的。

    无论是什么问题,几分钟后就自行解决了。汉密尔顿在比赛结束时通过无线电向法拉利道歉,因为他关于策略的判断是错误的。

    汉密尔顿无法在赛后澄清情况,因为他没有进行电视或书面媒体任务。法拉利表示他感到不适,在接受了FIA医疗团队的检查后,被允许不参加赛后媒体区。

    但是瓦瑟尔——他对在常规媒体简报中被频繁询问这个话题感到沮丧——说:“我们叫了两辆车。‘伙计们,你们在VSC后面进维修区。’我的一个家伙说,‘不,我更喜欢留在赛道上。’

    他说,‘我错过了进维修区的入口。’不要责怪车队。

    法拉利后来发布的一段汉密尔顿的话中,他只说‘车队叫我进维修区,但我错过了入口’,并且他在车队无线电中也传达了类似的信息——如果字面意思是‘错过’,那么如果他事先得到了很多警告,却在最后一刻没有明显尝试进入维修区,这似乎会很奇怪。

    可能汉密尔顿实际上只是选择留在赛道上,但结果是一样的。

    这使得汉密尔顿处于明显的劣势,他通过争论试图让一次进站策略得以实施,但这反而巩固了糟糕的结果,因为他在比赛中使用了比其他任何领跑者都要长的10圈软胎。

    几圈之后,法拉利试图让汉密尔顿在正常赛车条件下进站,并改为两次进站策略。这将使他失去赛道位置,但至少汉密尔顿在比赛末段会有更新的轮胎,并且有多圈的时间差来尝试追上安东内利和两辆迈凯轮。

    法拉利表示,他距离实现一次进站策略还有6圈,但汉密尔顿认为,如果他进站就会失去两个位置,那么坚持等待并看看是否会有黄旗出现可能是有价值的。

    他被允许尝试,但失败了。尽管他的软胎在一开始表现良好,但它们逐渐减弱,然后在最后10圈急剧下降。

    在这个阶段,汉密尔顿的每圈时间都在1分38.6秒或更慢。他所竞争的赛车在这个阶段每圈快了1到2秒,速度损失如此严重,以至于甚至需要因慢漏气而进行计划外第二次停车的奥斯卡·皮亚斯特里,也能在最后追上并超过汉密尔顿。

    汉密尔顿将其描述为“痛苦的一课,但我对所做的决定承担全部责任。”

    英文原文

    Lewis Hamilton’s Singapore Grand Prix imploded after his error in failing to pit during the mid-race virtual safety car period as Ferrari instructed him to.

    Hamilton ran third behind team-mate Charles Leclerc in the first half of the Singapore race but slumped to sixth as his gamble on staying on old soft tyres to the end of the race backfired.

    Leclerc and Kimi Antonelli took the opportunity to make a cheap pitstop during the brief VSC period sparked by Lance Stroll’s stricken Aston Martin.

    Had Hamilton done the same, he would likely have emerged just ahead of Lando Norris, who had pitted a few laps before the VSC and gained ground with the undercut.

    As he did not, and team radio only existed of Leclerc being instructed to pit, it seemed as though Ferrari had inexplicably left Hamilton out during the VSC.

    This appeared doubly odd given Hamilton was on softs - with the other two pitting to switch from mediums - after running the harder compound in the opening stint.

    So running a one-stop to the end would mean an unrealistically long second stint.

    But that was the misleading consequence of an unusual fault that prevented Ferrari’s radio communications with Hamilton through and shortly after the VSC period from being heard.

    His onboard camera and audio suffered a clear distortion shortly after the VSC began. Ferrari is adamant that Hamilton was instructed - at the same time as Leclerc - around Turn 16, but he did not.

    There were no radio messages to or from Hamilton for a short while, even when the VSC period ended. This is always met with a message that the VSC is ending to make sure the driver is ready to resume racing - so it is consistent with the notion that something odd happened to prevent Hamilton’s radio from being captured, not just muted (which sometimes happens).

    Whatever issue there was resolved itself after a few minutes. Hamilton apologised to Ferrari on the radio at the end of the race for his call on the strategy being wrong.

    Hamilton was not able to clarify the situation post-race as he did not conduct television or written media duties. Ferrari said he felt unwell and, after being seen by the FIA medical team, was given permission not to attend the post-race media pen.

    But Vasseur - who grew frustrated about being asked so many questions about the topic in his regular media debrief - said: “We called two cars. ‘Guys, you pit behind the VSC.’ One of my guys said, ‘no, I prefer to stay on track’.

    “He said, ‘I missed the pit entry’. Don't blame the team.”

    In a quote from Hamilton later issued by Ferrari, he only said “the team called me in but I missed the entry”, and he did relay a similar message over the team radio - if meant literally 'missed', it would seem odd if he was told with plenty of warning and made no obvious attempt to get into the pitlane at the last moment.

    It may be that Hamilton actually just chose to stay out, but the outcome was the same.

    It put Hamilton at a clear disadvantage and he doubled down by arguing to try to make the one-stop work from there only solidified a poor result as he ran the softs 10 laps longer than any of the other frontrunners did during the race.

    A few laps later, Ferrari tried to get Hamilton to pit in normal racing conditions and switch to a two-stop. This would have cost him track position, but at least Hamilton would have had fresher tyres for the end of the race plus a multi-lap offset to try to come back at the likes of Antonelli and the two McLarens.

    Ferrari said he was six laps short of making a one-stop viable, but Hamilton argued if he was already going to lose two positions with a pitstop it could be worth trying to hold on and see if another caution period occurred.

    He was told he could try, but it failed. Though his softs held on well for a while, they steadily faded and then fell away sharply in the final 10 laps.

    In this period, every lap of Hamilton’s was 1m38.6s or slower. The cars he was racing were between 1-2s faster per lap in this period, and the loss of pace was so severe that even Oscar Piastri, who required an unplanned second stop for a slow puncture, was able to catch and pass Hamilton late on.

    Hamilton described it as a “painful lesson, but I take full responsibility for the decisions I made”.

    The Race ·

    查看原文 →

    内容来自公开信源,聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。

公开资讯页面,通过同源公开 API 读取已发布内容。