← 返回资讯流

F1 中英提炼 · 公开详情

  1. 赛事新闻

    瓦塞尔回应汉密尔顿与勒克莱尔碰撞:这是尊重问题

    法拉利车队领队瓦塞尔回应汉密尔顿与勒克莱尔在墨西哥大奖赛中的碰撞,称这是尊重问题。他表示,当你在4号弯处于1-2位时,不会想到自己赢不了这场比赛。

    瓦塞尔回应汉密尔顿与勒克莱尔碰撞:这是尊重问题

    瓦塞尔回应汉密尔顿与勒克莱尔碰撞:“这是尊重问题”

    法拉利车队负责人就这起让法拉利在墨西哥错失胜利的事件发表看法

    夏尔·勒克莱尔,法拉利,刘易斯·汉密尔顿,法拉利

    “当你在4号弯处于1-2位时,你不会想到自己赢不了这场比赛。”

    这句话充分说明了法拉利车队领队弗雷德·瓦塞尔在F1墨西哥大奖赛后有多么失望。

    法拉利在2026赛季首次夺得杆位,功臣是刘易斯·汉密尔顿,夏尔·勒克莱尔位列第三;自2024年以来,还没有哪条赛道的发车格对这支跃马军团如此有利。

    头排起步的乔治·拉塞尔在1号弯前失去动量,勒克莱尔随即向队友发起挑战,汉密尔顿勉强守住了优势;随后这位摩纳哥车手在4号弯外侧发动攻势,在弯心处取得领先,但两辆赛车都冲得太深,最终双双驶出赛道。

    这次事故让两位车手都失去了争胜的机会。汉密尔顿缓缓驶回赛道,被马克斯·维斯塔潘超越——他此后再也没能反超这位最终的分站冠军——而勒克莱尔则因切过5号弯后明显保持了持续优势而被罚时五秒,最终以令人失望的第四名完赛。

    勒克莱尔部分地将事故归咎于赛道布局——“最终我们就是需要不允许我们玩弄那种极限和灰色地带的赛道,”他这样认为——但瓦塞尔不接受这个说法。

    “不。赛道布局当然没有帮助,因为如果你看看过去几年,我们确实有这类问题,但这根本不能成为借口,”这位法国人说道。

    夏尔·勒克莱尔,法拉利,刘易斯·汉密尔顿,法拉利

    “老实说,我有点沮丧,因为过去几场比赛我们在性能上确实取得了实质性的进步。我们在4号弯时是1-2。当你在4号弯是1-2时,你不会想象自己赢不了比赛。

    “这对我来说非常沮丧,但并不是我最重要——对于为这个项目工作的2000人来说,这非常令人沮丧。而这我需要时间来消化。”

    这不是本赛季第一次涉及两辆法拉利赛车的事故,在意大利大奖赛起步时,汉密尔顿最终冲进砂石区,因为勒克莱尔没有给他留出空间——根据官方竞赛指南,这没有问题。

    尽管如此,瓦塞尔坚称没有必要在赛前与他的车手们谈话。“我们可以讨论年龄问题,但这不是在赛前讨论你是在右侧还是左侧的问题。我唯一的讨论,是尊重的问题,”他说。

    当被追问是否可以要求车手不要将个人目标置于车队之上时,瓦塞尔进一步阐述:“这正是尊重的含义——他们不是为自己工作,而是为一个团队工作,为许多赞助商工作,为公司2000名员工工作;那些伙计们,当我们必须推动升级时,他们夜以继日地工作,我们必须记住这一点。”

    然而,当被问及他是否觉得两位车手都有责任时,瓦塞尔含糊其辞地回应道:“我没有和他们讨论过。让我先和他们谈谈。”

    瓦塞尔还解释了为什么勒克莱尔在切过5号弯后没有把位置还给汉密尔顿——不仅因为维斯塔潘此时已经夹在两人之间,还因为电视信号延迟意味着他们没有足够的时间做出决定。

    “情况并不是很清楚,”瓦塞尔说。“我们和赛事控制中心进行了讨论,但你必须在11号弯之前采取行动。视频和现实之间有五秒的延迟。这意味着你实际上已经到11号弯了。

    “规则很明确,在这种情况下你必须在11号弯之前把位置还回去。而且我们在赛前就约定好了,他们必须自己来做这件事,因为如果是1号弯的违规,那是在4号弯之前处理。赛车已经在4号弯了,但我们(还)没在电视上看到那起事件。”

    英文原文

    Fred Vasseur reacts to Lewis Hamilton, Charles Leclerc clash: “It’s a matter of respect”

    Ferrari team boss weighs in on the incident that cost Ferrari victory in Mexico

    Charles Leclerc, Ferrari, Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari

    “When you are 1-2 at Turn 4, you don't imagine that you won't win the race.”

    This statement says a lot about Ferrari team principal Fred Vasseur’s disappointment following Formula 1’s Mexico Grand Prix.

    Ferrari was on pole for the first time in the 2026 season, courtesy of Lewis Hamilton, with Charles Leclerc third; no grid had been so favourable to the prancing horse since 2024.

    As front-row starter George Russell lost momentum ahead of Turn 1, Leclerc challenged his team-mate, who narrowly retained the advantage; the Monegasque then launched an attack around the outside of Turn 4 and was ahead at the apex, but both cars ran deep and ended up outside of the track.

    The incident cost both drivers their shot at a win. Hamilton trundled back on track and was overtaken by Max Verstappen – he never found a way back past the eventual race winner – while Leclerc copped a five-second penalty for the obvious lasting advantage he retained from cutting Turn 5 and had a disappointing drive to fourth.

    Leclerc partly blamed the incident on the layout – “Eventually we just need tracks that don't allow us to play with those kinds of limits and grey areas,” he reckoned – but Vasseur wouldn’t have it.

    “No. The layout of the track, for sure it's not helping, because if you have a look the last couple of years we had this kind of issue, but it can't be an excuse at all,” the Frenchman said.

    Charles Leclerc, Ferrari, Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari

    “Honestly, I'm a bit frustrated because we did a proper step forward in terms of performance the last couple of events. We were 1-2 at Turn 4. When you are 1-2 at Turn 4, you don't imagine that you won't win the race.

    “It's a lot of frustration for me, but I'm not the most important – it's a lot of frustration for the 2,000 people working for the project. And this I will need time to digest.”

    This is not the first incident involving both Ferrari cars this season, with Hamilton ending up in the gravel at the start of the Italian GP as Leclerc failed to leave him room – which was fine according to the official racing guidelines.

    Still, Vasseur insisted there was no need for pre-race talks with his drivers. “We can discuss ages for this, but it's not a matter to discuss before if you are on the right-hand side, if you are the left-hand side. It's my only discussion, it's a matter of respect,” he said.

    Pressed on whether he could ask his drivers not to put their individual objectives over the team, Vasseur expanded: “This is typically what means respect – that they are not working for themselves, they are working for a group, they are working for a lot of sponsors, they are working for the 2,000 people of the company; the guys, when we had to push for the upgrades, they were working night and day, and we have to keep this in mind.”

    However, when asked if he felt both drivers were responsible, Vasseur elusively responded: “I didn't discuss with them. Let me discuss with them first.”

    Vasseur also explained why Leclerc didn’t yield the position back to Hamilton after cutting Turn 5 – not only because Verstappen now was between them, but simply because TV lag meant they didn’t have sufficient time to make a decision.

    “It was not very clear,” Vasseur said. “We had a discussion with the race control, but you have to act before Turn 11. You have five seconds’ delay between the video and the reality. It means that you are already in Turn 11.

    “The regulation is clear that you have to give back the position in this case before Turn 11. And we agreed before the race that they have to do it by themselves, because for an infringement in Turn 1, it's before Turn 4. The car is in Turn 4, but we didn't see the incident on the TV [yet].”

    Motorsport.com ·

    查看原文 →

    内容来自公开信源,聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。

公开资讯页面,通过同源公开 API 读取已发布内容。