角田裕毅逃过处罚，保住意大利大奖赛积分
小红牛车手角田裕毅在蒙扎因重新起步时发车位停放位置疑似违规而接受赛后调查，最终未受处罚，保住第10名的积分。
角田裕毅逃脱处罚，保住意大利大奖赛积分
经过赛后的调查，角田裕得以保住他在一级方程式意大利大奖赛上的第十名，调查针对的是他在比赛重新开始时的发车位置
在蒙扎比赛早期一次重新开始时的发车位置受到调查后，小红牛车手角田裕毅逃脱了处罚
在第6圈重新开始比赛（此前第2圈勒克莱尔发生事故引发红旗）时，角田裕毅在发车区就位第14位时，似乎把车停在了自己的发车格之外
赛事控制中心对角田的站位感到不妥，迅速增加了一圈编队圈，赛事干事决定在比赛结束后再重新审查此案，并传召角田和车队代表，理由是“涉嫌违反国际汽联一级方程式规则第 B5.9.4 条——15:41 发车程序违规”。
这意味着角田面临失去他来之不易的第10名积分的风险，那是他在代表小红牛（小红牛）出战的第二场大奖赛上获得的本赛季首个积分。
角田解释说，他起初对自己的发车位置感到困惑，所以他原本准备在左侧第15位排位，随后才意识到必须横穿赛道，在右侧第14位发车位排位，这导致了赛车呈现出一个指向维修区护栏的别扭角度。
“从第14位和第15位之间发车，我有点困惑，”角田解释道，“在我看来，红旗出示之前我并没有真正获得那个位置。我以为自己是第15位。但至少我停在了方框后面，距离相当远，所以我不认为我从中获得了任何优势。”
干事们同意小红牛（小红牛）的观点，认为角田不是抢跑，也没有对其他参赛者造成影响。增加一个额外的编队圈是赛事总监自由裁量的决定，而且作为一个技术性问题，被认为并非直接由角田本人造成，因为车队事先并未被告知这一要求。
那种情况下，涉事车手要么从维修通道发车，要么冒着接受停车再出发处罚的风险。但干事们一致认为，车队没有理由让角田驶入维修区，因此不会对这位日本车手实施处罚。
在上赛季末失去正式席位后，角田成为了红牛的储备车手，并回到老东家小红牛（小红牛）替补利亚姆·劳森出赛，而劳森则顶替受伤的伊萨克·哈贾尔加盟了红牛。
22号车最初驶向发车区的左侧，随后车手意识到自己正前往错误的发车位置，于是改变方向，将赛车停进了正确的发车格，并在格内处于正确位置。干事们通过多个机位的录像核实了这一点。
赛事总监在作证时表示，这是他基于该车在驶向发车位时的表现所做出的决定，即进行一次额外的编队圈。他表示，让赛车处于那个位置发车，他感到不放心。
(i) 该车并不处于“抢发”位置——参照F1规则第B5.1.1c条，因为前轮胎的接地面并未超出发车位标线（前方和侧面）。
(ii) 在车手会议上，赛事总监告知，就发车而言，赛道边界是维修区墙壁，而在本案例中，即使该车车头朝右，它至少还有4米的空间可以从发车位置驶出。
(iii) 没有其他车手受到22号车所处位置的影响。
(iv) 22号车的车手并不是额外编队圈的“原因”。
(v) 车队从未被告知比赛控制部门认为22号车是额外编队圈的原因。
干事们同意上述观点，并认为额外编队圈是由于比赛总监对局势的判断所致，而不是直接由22号车的车手造成的。
此外，B5.9.4条款继续规定，如果导致额外编队圈的车手随后能够开始进行额外编队圈，他必须在该圈结束时进入维修通道，并从维修通道发车。只有当车手未能做到这一点时，才会被处以强制性的停走处罚。
换句话说，处罚的原因是未能进入维修通道并从那里起步。处罚并不是因为引发了额外的编队圈，何况他是否真的引发了额外的编队圈本身也尚未确定。
这里出现了一个关键问题：要遵守进入维修通道并从那里起步的要求，车手必须知道自己就是额外编队圈的原因。车队代表援引了一些情况，说明额外的编队圈曾因外部原因而启动，例如摄影师的位置等。而在本案中，没有任何消息发送给车队或车手，告知他们就是额外编队圈的原因。
基于赛车已经按照规则停放在其发车格内的这一事实，我们的判断是，车队没有任何理由指示其车手进入维修通道并从那里起步。
因此，无论该名车手是否直接导致了额外的编队圈，车队和车手都不知道自己被视为原因，所以我们认定本案中无法施加停站加罚（Stop and Go）处罚，并决定不再采取进一步行动。
我们注意到，赛事总监出于善意并本着高度谨慎的态度，下令进行了额外的编队圈。我们还注意到，国际汽联或许可以考虑建立一套程序，在被认定是导致额外编队圈原因时通知相关车队和车手，以便他们随后能够遵守B5.9.4条款的要求。
英文原文
Yuki Tsunoda keeps Italian GP point after escaping sanction
Yuki Tsunoda gets to keep his 10th place in Formula 1's Italian Grand Prix following a post-race investigation into his grid position at the restart
Racing Bulls driver Yuki Tsunoda has escaped punishment after an investigation into his grid position at an early restart of the Monza race.
On a lap 6 restart, which followed a red flag for Charles Leclerc's accident on lap 2, Tsunoda appeared to park out of his grid box as he took up his 14th position on the starting grid.
Race control wasn't comfortable with Tsunoda's position and swiftly added an additional formation lap, with the race stewards opting to revisit the case after the race, summoning Tsunoda and team representatives for an "alleged breach of Article B5.9.4 of the FIA F1 Regulations – Start Procedure infringement at 15:41."
That meant Tsunoda was under threat of losing his hard-earned point for 10th place, his first point of the season on his second grand prix outing with Racing Bulls.
Tsunoda explained that he was initially confused by his starting position, so he was set to line up in 15th on the left-hand side before realising he had to cross the track and line up on the right-hand side in the 14th grid slot, which caused the awkward angle of the car as he pointed towards the pitwall.
"I was a bit confused starting between 14th and 15th," Tsunoda explained. "In my view, I didn't really gain the position before the red flag. I thought I was 15th. But at least I parked behind the box, pretty far, so I don't think I gained any advantage for that."
The stewards agreed with Racing Bulls that Tsunoda was not in a false start position and that there was no impact on other competitors. Adding an extra formation lap was a decision at the discretion of the race director, and as a technicality it was deemed not to be directly caused by Tsunoda himself because the team had not been told so.
That would have involved the driver in question to either start the race from the pitlane, or risk a stop-and-go penalty. But the stewards agreed that there was no reason for the team to instruct Tsunoda to comer into the pits, so it will not impose a penalty on the Japanese driver.
Having lost his regular seat at the end of last season, Tsunoda became Red Bull's reserve driver and returned to his former team Racing Bulls deputising for Liam Lawson, who replaced the injured Isack Hadjar at Red Bull.
Car 22 approached the grid initially heading for the left hand side of the grid, then realising he was headed for the wrong grid position, the driver changed direction and positioned his car in the correct grid box and in the correct position within the grid box. This was verified by the Stewards with video from multiple camera angles.
The Race Director, in evidence, stated that it was his call, based on the behaviour of the car on the approach to the grid box, to commence an extra formation lap. He stated he was not comfortable starting the race with the car in that position.
(i) The car was not in a “false start” position – referring to Article B5.1.1c of the F1 regulations, because no contact patch of the front tyres was outside the grid box lines (front and side)
(ii) At the Drivers meeting, the Race Director advised that for the start, the track limits were the pit walls and in this case, even though the car was pointed to the right, it had at least 4 metres of space to move off from the start
(iii) No other driver was impacted by the position of Car 22
(iv) The driver of Car 22 was not the “cause” of the extra formation lap.
(v) At no time was the team advised that Race Control considered Car 22 to be the cause of the extra formation lap.
The Stewards agree with the points above and consider that the extra formation lap resulted from the Race Director’s assessment of the situation, rather than being directly caused by the driver of Car 22.
Further, Article B5.9.4 goes on to specify that if a driver who causes the extra formation lap and is then able to start the extra formation lap, he must enter the Pit Lane at the end of the lap and start from the Pit Lane. It is only then, if the driver fails to do this, that the mandatory penalty of a Stop and Go penalty is imposed.
In other words, the penalty is for failing to come into the Pit Lane and start from there. The penalty is not for causing the extra formation lap, if indeed, he caused the extra formation lap in the first place.
A critical issue emerges here, in that in order to comply with the requirement to enter and start from the Pit Lane, a driver would need to know that he was the cause of the extra formation lap. The team representative quoted situations where extra formation laps have been commenced due to extraneous circumstances such as the position of a photographer etc. In this case, no message was sent to the team or the driver, advising them that they were the cause of the extra formation lap.
The team, based on the fact that the car was positioned within its starting grid box in compliance with the regulations, had, in our determination, no reason to instruct its driver to enter and start from the Pit Lane.
Accordingly, irrespective of whether or not the driver directly caused the extra formation lap, the team and driver were unaware that they were being considered as the cause, therefore we determine that we are unable to impose a Stop and Go penalty in this case, and decide to take no further action.
We note that the Race Director acted in good faith and out of an abundance of caution in ordering an extra formation lap. We further note that the FIA might wish to consider implementing a process to advise teams and drivers if they are considered to be the cause of an extra formation lap, so that they are then able to comply with the requirements of Article B5.9.4.
Motorsport.com ·
内容来自公开信源，聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。