FIA下周审理迈凯伦与红牛对摩纳哥大奖赛的上诉
国际汽联（FIA）将于8月25日闭门审理迈凯伦和红牛对摩纳哥大奖赛恢复皮埃尔·加斯利领奖台决定的上诉。加斯利因两次维修区超速被罚时5秒跌至第七，复审后其第三名成绩被恢复，引发多支车队不满。
FIA下周审理迈凯伦与红牛对摩纳哥大奖赛的上诉
两支车队对6月恢复皮埃尔·加斯利摩纳哥领奖台的决定提出上诉
兰多·诺里斯，迈凯伦，皮埃尔·加斯利，阿尔派
下周，国际汽联（FIA）将审理迈凯伦和红牛对摩纳哥大奖赛恢复皮埃尔·加斯利领奖台决定的上诉。
这位阿尔派车手在6月7日以第三名冲线，但因两次维修区超速被罚时5秒，愤怒的加斯利最终跌至第七名，红牛的伊萨克·哈贾尔因此获得领奖台。
但这支法国车队立即提出复审请求，因为它有证据表明这位30岁车手并未超过60公里/小时的限速，甚至留出了额外余量以保持在限速以下。
在复审听证会上，FOM——F1的计时方——承认维修区用于计算速度的距离测量存在错误。
这导致平均速度被高估，因此赛会接受这一错误作为证据，认为加斯利的处罚应被撤销，其第三名成绩也应恢复。
因此，这位法国车手最终获得了职业生涯第六个领奖台，但这引发了各车队的愤怒，因为加斯利并非唯一因所谓维修区超速而受罚的车手。
安德烈亚·基米·安东内利，梅赛德斯，刘易斯·汉密尔顿，法拉利，伊萨克·哈贾尔，红牛车队，托托·沃尔夫，梅赛德斯
唯一的不同之处在于，其他车手已在比赛中执行了处罚，这让各车队对阿尔派的抗议成功感到难以置信。
奥斯卡·皮亚斯特里尤其持有强烈意见，这位迈凯伦车手为执行处罚额外进站，导致他以第五名冲线，落后于加斯利和哈贾尔。
“我对这个决定感到非常震惊，”皮亚斯特里在巴塞罗那站后表示。
“当其他人因同样的事情受罚并在比赛中执行了处罚，你怎么能改变其中一个处罚，明知至少还有五六场比赛受到了影响，这太令人震惊了。”
乔治·拉塞尔可以说是受害最深的，这位梅赛德斯车手在进站时失去了潜在的领奖台位置——结果赛会认定他未正确执行处罚。
这导致他被罚通过维修区，这位争冠车手从前十跌至第12名，落后领跑车手积分榜的队友基米·安东内利68分。
奥斯卡·皮亚斯特里，迈凯伦，伊萨克·哈贾尔，红牛车队
“我显然失去了位置，但我只能想象乔治的感受，”皮亚斯特里补充道。“我简直不敢相信自己的眼睛。
“我因为执行处罚把位置输给了皮埃尔。理论上我应该是第三，但理论上乔治也应该是第三。
“整件事现在一团糟。他们给自己开了一个相当糟糕的先例。”
因此，迈凯伦和红牛对该决定提出上诉，而梅赛德斯则提出复审，但随后撤回，因为它几乎没有机会推翻拉塞尔的成绩。
数周以来，有关程序的消息一直沉寂，但FIA现已确认，其国际上诉法院将于8月25日星期二审理迈凯伦和红牛的上诉。
审理将在本周末荷兰大奖赛之后，于巴黎FIA总部闭门进行，这是2026年夏休期后的首场比赛。
英文原文
FIA to hear McLaren and Red Bull's Monaco GP appeal next week
The two teams have appealed against the decision to reinstate Pierre Gasly's Monaco podium from June
Lando Norris, McLaren, Pierre Gasly, Alpine
Next week, the FIA will hear the appeals from McLaren and Red Bull against the decision to reinstate Pierre Gasly’s podium at the Monaco Grand Prix.
The Alpine driver crossed the line in third on 7 June but two five-second penalties for pitlane speeding demoted a furious Gasly to seventh, handing Red Bull’s Isack Hadjar a podium.
But the French outfit immediately lodged a right of review bid because it had evidence that the 30-year-old had not exceeded the 60km/h limit and even took additional margin to stay below.
During the right of review hearing FOM - F1’s timekeeper - admitted that there had been an error with the distance measurement in the pitlane from which speeds were taken.
This caused average speeds to be over-reported and so stewards accepted the error as evidence that Gasly should have his penalties rescinded and thus, his third-place reinstated.
As such, the Frenchman finally secured his sixth career podium but this caused fury among teams, because Gasly wasn’t the only driver to be penalised for supposedly speeding in the pitlane.
Andrea Kimi Antonelli, Mercedes, Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari, Isack Hadjar, Red Bull Racing, Toto Wolff, Mercedes
The only difference was that other drivers had already served their penalties during the race, causing disbelief among teams that Alpine had been successful with its protest.
Oscar Piastri held a particularly strong opinion as the McLaren driver made an extra pitstop to serve his penalty, causing him to cross the finish line in fifth behind Gasly and Hadjar.
“I’m pretty mind-blown by the decision,” said Piastri at the following the Barcelona race.
“When other people have been penalised for the same thing and served a penalty in the race, how you can then change one penalty, knowing that at least five or six other races have been impacted by that, is astonishing.”
George Russell was arguably the hardest done by as the Mercedes driver lost a potential podium when he pitted - only for stewards to determine he hadn’t served the penalty correctly.
This resulted in a drive-through penalty that dropped the title contender out of the top 10 into 12th, causing him to fall 68 points behind his championship-leading team-mate Kimi Antonelli.
Oscar Piastri, McLaren, Isack Hadjar, Red Bull Racing
“I’ve obviously lost the position, but I can only imagine how George is feeling,” added Piastri. “I could not believe my eyes.
“I lost the position to Pierre because I served the penalty. Technically I should be P3, but then technically George should be P3.
“The whole thing is now a mess. It’s quite the precedent they’ve got themselves into.”
It therefore caused McLaren and Red Bull to appeal the decision, while Mercedes launched a right to review but subsequently withdrew that as it had little chance of getting Russell’s result overturned.
For weeks, news of the proceedings had gone quiet but the FIA has now confirmed that its International Court of Appeal will hear from McLaren and Red Bull on Tuesday 25 August.
This will take place behind closed doors at the FIA’s headquarters in Paris after this weekend’s Dutch Grand Prix, the first race since the 2026 summer shutdown.
Autosport ·
内容来自公开信源，聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。