← 返回资讯流

F1 中英提炼 · 公开详情

  1. 赛事新闻

    FIA确定迈凯伦与红牛摩纳哥大奖赛上诉听证日期

    国际汽联(FIA)将于下周审理迈凯伦和红牛针对摩纳哥大奖赛恢复皮埃尔·加斯利领奖台位置决定的上诉。

    FIA确定迈凯伦和红牛就摩纳哥大奖赛上诉的听证日期

    两支车队对6月恢复皮埃尔·加斯利摩纳哥领奖台成绩的决定提出上诉

    兰多·诺里斯,迈凯伦,皮埃尔·加斯利,阿尔派车队

    下周,FIA将听取迈凯伦和红牛针对恢复皮埃尔·加斯利在摩纳哥大奖赛领奖台成绩的决定所提出的上诉。

    6月7日,这位阿尔派车手冲线时名列第三,但因两次维修区超速各被罚时五秒,愤怒的Gasly被降至第七名,从而使红牛车队的哈贾尔登上了领奖台。

    但这家法国车队立即提出了复审申请,因为有证据表明这位30岁的车手并未超过60公里/小时的限速,甚至还额外留出了余量以保持低于限速。

    在复审听证会上,FOM——F1的计时方——承认维修区内用于测速的距离测量存在误差。

    这导致平均速度被高报,因此干事们接受该误差作为证据,认定Gasly的处罚应被撤销,从而恢复他的第三名成绩。

    因此,这位法国车手最终拿到了他职业生涯的第六个领奖台,但这在各车队中引发了愤怒,因为因为据称在维修通道超速而被处罚的并不只有加斯利一人。

    安德烈亚·基米·安东内利,梅赛德斯;刘易斯·汉密尔顿,法拉利;伊萨克·哈贾尔,红牛车队;托托·沃尔夫,梅赛德斯

    唯一的区别是,其他车手已经在比赛中执行完了他们的处罚,这令各车队难以置信:阿尔派 的抗议竟然成功了。

    奥斯卡·皮亚斯特里持有尤为强烈的意见,因为这位迈凯伦车手额外多进了一次站来执行处罚,导致他最终以第五名越过终点线,排在加斯利和哈贾尔之后。

    “这个决定让我相当难以置信,”皮亚斯特里在巴塞罗那比赛后说道。

    “当其他车手因为同样的事情受罚并在比赛中执行了处罚时,你却还能更改一项处罚,而且明知这已经影响到了至少五六场比赛,这实在令人震惊。”"

    乔治·拉塞尔可以说是最受委屈的一位,这位梅赛德斯车手在进站后本有望登上领奖台——结果干事却认定他没有正确执行处罚。

    这导致他被处以一次通过维修区的处罚,从积分榜前十跌至第12名,使他落后于领跑车手总冠军的队友基米·安东内利68分。

    皮亚斯特里,迈凯伦;哈贾尔,红牛车队

    “我显然丢掉了这个位置,但我只能想象George现在的感受,”Piastri补充道,“我简直不敢相信自己的眼睛。”

    “我把位置丢给了Pierre,因为我接受了处罚。从技术上讲我应该是第三名,但从技术上讲George也应该是第三名。”

    “整件事现在一团糟。他们给自己树立了一个相当离谱的先例。”

    因此,这促使迈凯伦和红牛对这一决定提出上诉,而梅赛德斯则启动了复审权,但随后撤回了该申请,因为拉塞尔的成绩被推翻的可能性很小。

    数周以来,相关诉讼的消息一直沉寂,但国际汽联(FIA)现已确认,其国际上诉法院将于8月25日星期二听取迈凯伦和红牛的陈述。

    听证会将在本周末的荷兰大奖赛之后,于巴黎的国际汽联总部闭门举行,这是自2026年夏季休赛期以来的首场比赛。

    英文原文

    FIA sets date for McLaren and Red Bull's Monaco GP appeal

    The two teams have appealed against the decision to reinstate Pierre Gasly's Monaco podium from June

    Lando Norris, McLaren, Pierre Gasly, Alpine

    Next week, the FIA will hear the appeals from McLaren and Red Bull against the decision to reinstate Pierre Gasly’s podium at the Monaco Grand Prix.

    The Alpine driver crossed the line in third on 7 June but two five-second penalties for pitlane speeding demoted a furious Gasly to seventh, handing Red Bull’s Isack Hadjar a podium.

    But the French outfit immediately lodged a right of review bid because it had evidence that the 30-year-old had not exceeded the 60km/h limit and even took additional margin to stay below.

    During the right of review hearing FOM - F1’s timekeeper - admitted that there had been an error with the distance measurement in the pitlane from which speeds were taken.

    This caused average speeds to be over-reported and so stewards accepted the error as evidence that Gasly should have his penalties rescinded and thus, his third-place reinstated.

    As such, the Frenchman finally secured his sixth career podium but this caused fury among teams, because Gasly wasn’t the only driver to be penalised for supposedly speeding in the pitlane.

    Andrea Kimi Antonelli, Mercedes, Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari, Isack Hadjar, Red Bull Racing, Toto Wolff, Mercedes

    The only difference was that other drivers had already served their penalties during the race, causing disbelief among teams that Alpine had been successful with its protest.

    Oscar Piastri held a particularly strong opinion as the McLaren driver made an extra pitstop to serve his penalty, causing him to cross the finish line in fifth behind Gasly and Hadjar.

    “I’m pretty mind-blown by the decision,” said Piastri at the following the Barcelona race.

    “When other people have been penalised for the same thing and served a penalty in the race, how you can then change one penalty, knowing that at least five or six other races have been impacted by that, is astonishing.”

    George Russell was arguably the hardest done by as the Mercedes driver lost a potential podium when he pitted - only for stewards to determine he hadn’t served the penalty correctly.

    This resulted in a drive-through penalty that dropped the title contender out of the top 10 into 12th, causing him to fall 68 points behind his championship-leading team-mate Kimi Antonelli.

    Oscar Piastri, McLaren, Isack Hadjar, Red Bull Racing

    “I’ve obviously lost the position, but I can only imagine how George is feeling,” added Piastri. “I could not believe my eyes.

    “I lost the position to Pierre because I served the penalty. Technically I should be P3, but then technically George should be P3.

    “The whole thing is now a mess. It’s quite the precedent they’ve got themselves into.”

    It therefore caused McLaren and Red Bull to appeal the decision, while Mercedes launched a right to review but subsequently withdrew that as it had little chance of getting Russell’s result overturned.

    For weeks, news of the proceedings had gone quiet but the FIA has now confirmed that its International Court of Appeal will hear from McLaren and Red Bull on Tuesday 25 August.

    This will take place behind closed doors at the FIA’s headquarters in Paris after this weekend’s Dutch Grand Prix, the first race since the 2026 summer shutdown.

    Motorsport.com ·

    查看原文 →

    内容来自公开信源,聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。

公开资讯页面,通过同源公开 API 读取已发布内容。