← 返回资讯流

F1 中英提炼 · 公开详情

  1. 赛事新闻

    法拉利解释汉密尔顿荷兰大奖赛无线电爆发:并非实验品

    法拉利车队负责人弗雷德·瓦塞尔澄清了刘易斯·汉密尔顿在荷兰大奖赛期间无线电爆发的原因。法拉利连续第二场比赛未能登上领奖台,汉密尔顿获得第四,队友夏尔·勒克莱尔第五。

    当 Hamilton 在 Dutch GP 感觉自己像“小白鼠”时,法拉利 实际上想做什么

    这位七届世界冠军在周日的 F1 Dutch GP 期间多次在无线电中爆发,法拉利 已解释其意图是什么

    法拉利 老板 Fred Vasseur 澄清了是什么导致 汉密尔顿 在这支 Formula 1 车队艰难的 荷兰站 周末期间在无线电中爆发

    这支 Scuderia 连续第二场比赛无缘领奖台,Hamilton 获得第四,队友 勒克莱尔 位列第五——与 Budapest 的结果相反——而在周日这场 72 圈的比赛中,对 法拉利 而言决定性时刻是什么已很清楚

    第一次发生在比赛中段,当时汉密尔顿刚刚超越迈凯伦车手奥斯卡·皮亚斯特里升至第五,并开始逼近速度慢得多的勒克莱尔。但由于赞德福特的赛道特性狭窄,这位七届世界冠军发现很难超车,因此呼吁车队下达指令,但指令并未到来,这让兰多·诺里斯以及梅赛德斯双雄基米·安东内利和乔治·拉塞尔得以在前方扩大优势。

    “真是浪费时间的妙招啊,伙计们,干得好!”汉密尔顿讽刺地厉声说道。当勒克莱尔在第43圈——比原定时间晚了一圈——进行第二次进站时,汉密尔顿最终升至第四。

    人们本以为这位英国人随后不久就会进站更换新轮胎,毕竟法拉利赛车周围的车手都这么做了,但法拉利车队却选择让汉密尔顿在外面多跑很久,这意味着他最终取得了领先。

    但诺里斯和安东内利凭借更新的轮胎迅速逼近,到第53圈时,他们彼此之间的差距都在一秒之内。“你们把我当小白鼠了吗?”汉密尔顿打趣道。他几乎成了活靶子,迈凯伦和梅赛德斯分别在54圈和55圈超越了他。

    这位法拉利车手基本上被蒙在鼓里,不知道自己的第二段为何如此漫长——长达30圈——直到第55圈因奥康引发的虚拟安全车,才让这位41岁的车手得以用掉硬胎,换上一套全新的软胎。

    “我们当时不想告诉他策略,因为不想向竞争对手泄露,”Vasseur说道。“我们想让他留在赛道上直到最后,我认为那会是正确的决定。

    “Charles本应进站。我们多跑了一圈,出现了一些混乱。我对此并不担心。所有人都会在简报会上回来。他们会对比赛有清晰的了解。

    “Charles一度对轮胎配方有些沮丧。我认为每个人对配方都有点困惑。Norris在第一次起步时[红旗前]用的是中性胎,然后他换成了软胎。

    今天三种化合物之间的差距非常微小。很难对策略有清晰的判断。有时候,我们不得不改变策略或做出调整,因为我们正试图向其他人学习。对他们来说,这有点令人沮丧。

    所以,汉密尔顿赛后媒体采访环节中讨论的焦点显而易见,期间他呼吁法拉利要有‘更好的执行’。他援引老东家梅赛德斯作为灵感来源,考虑到银箭在拉塞尔于第65圈将第二名让给安东内利时迅速下达的车队指令——当时这位积分榜领跑者在虚拟安全车下换上了软胎,而这位英国人则留在外面用硬胎。

    拉塞尔最初告诉比赛工程师马库斯·达德利,‘我们丢掉了双领奖台’,因为汉密尔顿正在逼近他的前队友,但这位梅赛德斯车手守住了第三名,并在赛后表示这次交换是正确的决定。

    夏尔·勒克莱尔,法拉利,乔治·拉塞尔,梅赛德斯

    要不是之前与勒克莱尔的那场闹剧,汉密尔顿认为他本有更好的机会在后期争夺领奖台,瓦塞尔也附和了这些评论,称“今天的执行不够好”。

    “赛后你总是可以说,在第46圈做会更好,”这位法国人补充道。“问题是,当刘易斯追回到查尔斯身后时,我们本以为他会进站。

    “然后我们车后有个人。我们让他再多跑一圈。你不能让他在直道上多跑一圈还要交换位置。这并不容易。如果我现在回看这场比赛,我能看到差异。主要问题是我们没有告诉刘易斯,我们预计他会坚持到最后。这不是推进的问题。”

    这一结果使法拉利落后领头羊梅赛德斯87分,领先第三名迈凯伦75分,后者由诺里斯连续从杆位获胜,还剩11站比赛。

    英文原文

    What Ferrari actually meant to do when Hamilton felt like a "guinea pig" in Dutch GP

    The seven-time world champion had various radio outbursts during Sunday's F1 Dutch GP and Ferrari has explained what its intention was

    Ferrari boss Fred Vasseur has clarified what led to Lewis Hamilton’s radio outbursts during a tough Dutch Grand Prix weekend for the Formula 1 outfit.

    The Scuderia finished off the podium for a second, consecutive race as Hamilton took fourth with team-mate Charles Leclerc in fifth – the reverse of Budapest – and it is clear what the defining moments were for Ferrari during Sunday’s 72-lap contest.

    The first occurred midway through when Hamilton had just overtaken McLaren driver Oscar Piastri for fifth and started closing in on a much slower Leclerc. But due to the tight nature of Zandvoort, the seven-time world champion found it difficult to overtake and was therefore calling for team orders which didn’t arrive, allowing Lando Norris, plus Mercedes duo Kimi Antonelli and George Russell, to increase their advantage up ahead.

    “Great way of wasting time guys, good job!” snapped a sarcastic Hamilton, who eventually took fourth when Leclerc made his second pitstop on lap 43 – one tour after he was initially supposed to do so.

    The assumption was that the Briton would come in for fresh tyres shortly afterwards, considering those around the Ferrari cars did the same, but the Scuderia opted to keep Hamilton out for much longer, which meant he eventually took the lead.

    But Norris and Antonelli rapidly closed in on fresher tyres, and by lap 53 they were all within a second of each other. “Are you using me as a guinea pig?” quipped Hamilton, who was practically a sitting duck as the McLaren and Mercedes respectively overtook him on laps 54 and 55.

    The Ferrari driver was essentially left in the dark as to why his second stint was so long - 30 laps - and it required a lap 55 virtual safety car caused by Esteban Ocon for the 41-year-old to ditch his hard tyres for a fresh set of softs.

    “We didn't want to tell him the strategy at this stage because we didn't want to disclose it to the competitors,” said Vasseur. “We wanted to keep him on track until the end, I think it would have been the right call.

    “Charles was supposed to pit. We extended one lap and it was a kind of confusion. I'm not worried about this. Everybody will be back in the briefing. They will have a clear picture about the race.

    “Charles was a bit frustrated at one stage about the compound. I think everybody was a bit lost about the compound. Norris started with mediums on the first start [before the red flag], then he moved to softs.

    “The difference between the three compounds was very marginal today. It was difficult to have a clear picture on the strategy. Sometimes, we have to change the strategy or adapt, because we are trying to learn from the others. For them it's a bit frustrating.”

    So it’s obvious what dominated discussions in Hamilton’s post-race media session, during which he called for Ferrari to have ‘better execution’. He cited his former team Mercedes as inspiration, considering the late team orders the Silver Arrows quickly deployed as Russell handed second to Antonelli on lap 65 after the championship leader took softs under the VSC, while the Briton stayed out on hards.

    Russell initially told race engineer Marcus Dudley that “we’ve lost a double podium” as Hamilton closed in on his former team-mate, but the Mercedes driver held on for third and post-race said the swap was the correct decision.

    Charles Leclerc, Ferrari, George Russell, Mercedes

    Had it not been for the earlier fiasco with Leclerc, Hamilton reckons he’d have had a better shot at claiming a late podium and Vasseur echoed those comments, claiming “the execution today was not that good”.

    “You can always say after the race that it would have been better to do it on lap 46,” the Frenchman added. “The story is that, when Lewis came back on Charles, we were expecting him to pit.

    “Then we had someone in the shadow of the car. We asked him to do one lap more. You can't ask him to do one lap more and to swap positions in the straight line. It's not so easy. If I have a look at the race now, I can see the difference. The main issue is that we didn't tell Lewis that we were expecting him to go to the end. It was not a matter of pushing.”

    The result leaves Ferrari 87 points behind leader Mercedes and 75 ahead of third-placed McLaren, which has taken consecutive wins from pole via Norris, with 11 rounds remaining.

    Autosport ·

    查看原文 →

    内容来自公开信源,聚合内容版权归原作者与来源所有。

公开资讯页面,通过同源公开 API 读取已发布内容。